Chapter II
PLANNING AND DESIGN FRAMEWORK

This chapter provides an overview of the public outreach activities and policy framework that has influenced the development of the Orange Avenue Corridor Specific Plan. In addition, this chapter sets out the Planning Factors, Goals, and Objectives that form the foundation of the Specific Plan’s development standards, design criteria, and provisions.

A. PUBLIC OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY INPUT

Preparation of the Specific Plan included a comprehensive public participation process. The public was involved to accurately identify concerns, generate ideas, and clarify and resolve issues. Following are brief descriptions of the community involvement and outreach components:

A.1.    Publicity Program

A publicity campaign was carried out in order to effectively inform the public and to involve a diverse group of people in the process. The effort concentrated on distributing written information through community newsletters that were inserted into the Coronado Eagle and by maintaining a project website linked to City of Coronado’s website. The website included the Downtown Specific Plan Committee agendas and minutes, the Consultants’ Initial Memorandum of Findings, and reports on demographics and market demand, parking, and mobility. Additionally, the local community newspaper, the Coronado Eagle, published several articles on the Specific Plan process, while the public access television channel filmed and broadcasted one of the community workshops.

A.2.    Community Workshops

Saturday Workshop – March 23, 2002

Two public workshops were held on March 23, 2002 at the City Library to provide community members with the opportunity to contribute their input and to learn about what occurred throughout the consultants’ first week in Coronado (called “Immersion Week”.) The information gathered by the consultant team during Immersion Week activities and the observations made during the Downtown Walks were presented to the public. Interactive exercises were conducted in an effort to determine which issues were most important. Approximately 45 people attended the workshops.

Saturday Workshop – June 1, 2002

An additional informal workshop was held to solicit community input on desired land uses, building height, parking, a civic plaza and to maintain project momentum. The workshop was attended by approximately 32 persons.

Evening Workshop – June 24, 2003

A public workshop was held in the evening at the City Library to answer any questions regarding the Draft Specific Plan and to hear community response to the Plan. Comments were recorded to take back to the Specific Plan Committee for consideration at their July 24 meeting. Approximately 65 people attended the workshop.

A.3.    One-on-One Interviews

Over the course of two days (March 21 and 22, 2002) during Immersion Week, approximately 36 short interviews were conducted with community members representing various interests, including teens. Several key questions were asked of those being interviewed. These questions and the summarized responses are listed below:

    “What are Coronado’s strongest assets?”

•    

Village atmosphere -- small building scale, diverse storefronts, and façade variety.

•    

Community feel, pedestrian friendly, outdoor dining, and a safe walking downtown.

•    

Landscaped medians.

•    

Inviting, lively, and interactive atmosphere -- outdoor dining, pedestrians on street, opportunities for community to interact with each other.

•    

Orange Avenue’s “Main Street” atmosphere / a gathering place / the “Boardwalk” of Coronado – everything is physically close.

•    

Hotel Del Coronado as a tourist draw, small shops that are easy accessible by walking or biking.

•    

Unique look of small businesses.

•    

Eclectic architecture styles.

•    

Buildings like El Cordova, Hotel Del Coronado, and the Spreckels Building

•    “What should be removed from Orange Avenue?”

•    

Non-retail uses from Orange Avenue, as it creates gaps between shops and is a detriment to a viable shopping district.

•    

Vacant lots and buildings.

•    

Relocate real estate offices and liquor stores from Orange Avenue to the side streets.

•    

North of the Library is more residential, but it is not an inviting area until the Ferry Landing; buildings are not kept up as they are further south.

•    

Rundown buildings and stretches of Orange Avenue that don’t fit, e.g., shop appearance or type of goods sold.

•    

Replace the old movie theater with a new one.

•    

Mixed use, as vertical mixed uses are not working, especially ground floor retail with condominiums on top.

•    “What should be added to Orange Avenue?”

•    

Redevelop the entire Von’s block with an entertainment center, incorporating the existing facade: arcade for kids, food court, bring back existing businesses, create an anchor tenant, underground parking.

•    

Increase the community’s appreciation of downtown; tourists appreciate it!

•    

Create an arts and crafts “mall” in the Petco or Cora Mart building to attract out-of-towners.

•    

Fix up the older buildings while retaining the streetscape harmony.

•    

More parking.

•    

A place for kids aged 12 – 14 years old to hang out, as shown in TV shows (Saved by the Bell or Lizzie Mac).

•    

Better maintenance and more frequent trash pickups.

A.4.    Downtown Walks

On March 20, 2002, the consultant team took an afternoon guided walk with the Director of Coronado MainStreet Ltd and City Staff, and another early evening walk with local law enforcement agents. These were organized in order to identify unique features, note different land uses, record any visual observations and opportunities, and to identify areas or features that cause real or perceived public safety concerns.

A.5.    City Council/Planning Commission Workshops

Kick-off Dinner (March 30, 2002)

At a publicly noticed special meeting, the Consultants met informally with the City Council in conjunction with the Design Review and Planning Commissions, the Specific Plan Committee, City staff, and other officials representing Downtown interests. This was an opportunity for local leaders to discuss their “visions” and concerns for the area in a relaxed atmosphere.

City Council / Planning Commission Workshops

Separate workshops were held in June, 2002 with these bodies and a joint workshop in June, 2003. The purpose of the first workshop was to identify broad-based issues relevant to the Plan, discuss preliminary findings, and to receive direction. The second workshop was held to review the Draft Plan.

A.6.    Specific Plan Committee Workshops

A Specific Plan Committee (hereafter referred to as the Committee), consisting of 11 dedicated community members appointed by the City Council, contributed their unique backgrounds and perspectives toward creation of the Orange Avenue Corridor Specific Plan. Over the course of nearly 16 months, the consultants met numerous times with this group to provide information, discuss options, and receive the Committee’s input regarding various goals and issues for the Specific Plan. The decisions and direction provided by the Committee were then used to develop the draft Specific Plan. The Committee also met three times independently of the consultants. Listed below is a very brief summary of the Specific Plan Committee meetings.

•    

March 4, 2002 The Kickoff meeting topics included, “What Is a Specific Plan?”, Work Program and Schedule, and the Role of the Committee

•    

April 18, 2002 The Committee provided input to Mark Brodeur of the RRM Design Group on mixed use, zoning to restrict certain uses or to limit the quantity of certain uses, and building heights in the commercial areas.

•    

May 16, 2002 Gerry Trimble of Keyser Marston Associates summarized the initial findings regarding demographics and market demand for Coronado. The Committee provided input regarding the Urban Design Studio’s memorandum report, “A Direction for Downtown Coronado.”

•    

July 25, 2002 Gerry Trimble of Keyser Marston Associates presented initial findings regarding the Village Theater and Cora Mart sites and Alan Hoffman of The Mission Group presented initial data on the Parking Study.

•    

August 15 and 22, 2002 The Committee discussed and provided input to the Consultants on land uses and development standards for the commercial areas.

•    

September 12, 2002 The discussion of development standards continued, including mixed use and density.

•    

September 19, 2002 The Committee met independently of consultants and further discussed uses in the commercial zones.

•    

October 10, 2002 Alan Hoffman of The Mission Group presented various parking strategies and received input from the Committee; Danielle Putnam of RBF Consulting’s Urban Design Studio presented a supply/demand parking analysis for existing and future conditions; and the draft design criteria for the Commercial Zone were reviewed.

•    

October 31, 2002 The Committee discussed and provided input on design criteria for the R-4 Multiple Family Residential Zone and reviewed preliminary “wayfinding” signage concepts.

•    

November 14, 2002 The Committee met independently of consultants to discuss development standards in the R 4 Multiple Family Residential Zone.

•    

November 21, 2002 Alan Hoffman of The Mission Group presented highlights of a Mobility Study and received Committee input. The Committee reviewed and provided feedback on draft goals and implementation strategies for the Specific Plan.

•    

December 19, 2002 The Preliminary Draft Specific Plan was presented to the DSPC for input and comment.

•    

January June, 2003 Over the course of eight meetings (dates are listed below), the Committee was presented additional information and input on the inter-related topics of land use; parking standards; building height, mass and bulk; signage; and the special use permit process. Following extensive and thorough discussion of these topics, the Committee directed the consultants to make revisions to the Preliminary Draft Specific Plan and release it for public review.

– January 23, 2003

– February 6 and 20, 2003

– March 6, 10, and 20, 2003

– April 17, 2003

– June 5, 2003

•    

July 24, 2003 The Committee reviewed comments on the Draft Specific Plan made at the June 24 public workshop and June 25 Design Review Commission meeting. The Committee directed plan revisions to be prepared for the public hearing.

A.7.    Public Hearings

Public Hearings As required by state and local laws, public hearings with the Planning Commission and the City Council were held. These hearings provided additional opportunities for the community to offer input on the Specific Plan.

B. SPECIFIC PLAN POLICY FRAMEWORK

The Orange Avenue Corridor Specific Plan policy framework provides the primary policy guidance for the Specific Plan. All future development and redevelopment within the Orange Avenue Corridor Specific Plan shall be consistent with and take guidance from the Goals and Objectives as expressed in this Section.

The Policy Framework for the Orange Avenue Corridor Specific Plan is organized as follows:

•    

Specific Plan Planning Factors: Identifies the opportunities and constraints that influence and contribute to the successful implementation of the Orange Avenue Corridor Specific Plan.

•    

Specific Plan Goals: Provides the broad goals that future development and redevelopment in the Specific Plan area shall implement.

•    

Specific Plan Objectives: Provides more explicit policy statements that implement the Specific Plan’s Goals.

B.1    Specific Plan “Planning Factors”

This section describes those factors that influence and contribute to the successful implementation of the Orange Avenue Specific Plan, as they form the policy foundation of the Specific Plan. Planning Factors express issues, concerns, and the positive and negative attributes that contribute to the ultimate policy actions of this Specific Plan. The Planning Factors draw from community input; market analysis, mobility and parking studies; and observations by the planning consultant team. The Planning Factors are listed below, and are grouped into the following categories:

•    

Policy

•    

Land Use & Urban Design

•    

Parking

•    

Economic / Marketing

•    

Traffic / Circulation

Policy Planning Factors

•    

Develop a Community-Based Plan: The Specific Plan area stretches along Orange Avenue, and includes the southern commercial area referred to as “downtown” by residents; the northern commercial area adjacent to the Ferry Landing; and the multi-family-zoned residential area in between. Coronado residents, merchants, and property owners all have various feelings about how these different areas should be preserved or how they should change. Change is an inevitable part of a city’s evolution, but that does not mean it should proceed in an uncontrolled manner. A community that directs its future can keep and enhance what is valued, while encouraging and allowing changes that will contribute to the community’s vision.

•    

Establish Predictable/Understandable Criteria and Standards: The existing Orange Avenue Design Guidelines (revised 1991) are well written and cite good examples of design, but are non-specific and not regulatory. This means that development proposals can ignore them. Developers’ and designers’ efforts to interpret such guidelines are sometimes different from the understanding of City staff, Design Review Commissions, or decision makers. This uncertainty ultimately harms the City because developers, property owners and lenders perceive that it may be too risky to attempt improvements or projects that may benefit the community.

Land Use & Urban Design Planning Factors

•    

Mixed Use: Mixed use development (defined for this Specific Plan as residential above commercial) is a controversial topic in Coronado’s Commercial Zone. Concerns regarding mixed use include: (1) may create additional traffic; (2) increased development intensity; (3) marginal commercial uses; and (4) privacy issues. Residential development provides customers for adjacent commercial uses, but commercial uses sometimes have characteristics that create problems for residents, such as noise or unpleasant odors. It is perceived that mixed use developers in the commercial zoned areas profit from the residential units, while the additional commercial square footage may not be needed. Also, there is concern that currently viable commercial properties will convert to mainly residential use (condominiums) and slowly eliminate existing downtown businesses.

•    

“White Elephant” Lots and Buildings: Vacant buildings, such as the Cora Mart and the Village Theater, present unattractive gaps in Coronado’s urban fabric, influence the appearance of adjacent buildings, and do not add to the community’s economic vitality.

    

The Village Theater holds special memories for most of Coronado’s long-time residents and has nostalgic symbolism as the community’s indoor gathering space. It is where families went to the movies together, teenagers had their first dates, and children experienced their first afternoon matinees free of parental supervision. Emotionally, residents don’t like seeing the theatre inactive. Other functional buildings are also “white elephants” in that they do not contribute to the streetscape’s strong pedestrian environment, such as the Petco store and the Bank of America building.

Photo 4: Village Theater

•    

Protect Points of Community Pride: The community has specific unique features that it strongly identifies with and wants to protect, such as the landscaped medians on Orange Avenue.

Photo 5: Landscaped Median

•    

Existing Zoning Doesn’t Create the Desired Scale: In general, the community wants to maintain the low-rise, one- and two-story human scale development currently in the commercial zones; however, the current zoning allows buildings that are taller (3-story) and bulkier than most buildings currently found on Orange Avenue.

•    

Create a Central Civic Space: Most successful downtowns have a significant public open space that brings citizens together to celebrate community. To attract people downtown, activities need to be scheduled in a comfortable and central location. Coronado has Spreckels Park for outdoor cultural activities, but an urban space much closer to Downtown’s commercial area is needed. As stated in the Business Area Development Plan, a focal point such as an enhanced Rotary Park would complement and balance the Hotel Del Coronado’s future entry garden area (corner of Orange and R.H. Dana Place) and Adella Plaza. A central outdoor space would also give strolling visitors a significant destination and provide a place for residents to informally gather.

•    

Better “Wayfinding” Is Needed: There is a term in urban design called “wayfinding.” That is, urban design efforts must help people find their way to a place and within the place. Many people unfamiliar with Downtown Coronado do not know how to get there after disembarking from the Ferry, driving off the Bridge or coming up the Strand. They also are uncertain where to go once they are Downtown. Signage for parking (surface and underground), directional signage, and downtown directories and kiosks are lacking and needed.

Parking Planning Factors

•    

Parking Requirements Impact Intensity of Development: To satisfy parking requirements for new development, or for redevelopment greater than the building’s original square footage, relatively large lots are required. This is because the parking must be put underground or within a structure, where it is more difficult to accommodate the cars’ turning movements. The result is that smaller lots are difficult to redevelop and may simply deteriorate over time, or lot consolidations create projects that are bigger than what the community wants.

•    

Location of Public Parking: Public parking located in the right-of-way along city streets is desirable for reasons of convenience and pedestrian safety. Community members are concerned about the visual effects of parking structures.

Photo 6: On-street parking

•    

Vacant Land for Surface Parking Lots is Limited: Vacant land that could be used for surface parking in the Downtown commercial area is virtually non-existent. A few existing buildings have surface parking lots on Orange Avenue, such as La Avenida and Petco.

Demographic / Economic Planning Factors

•    

Small Population Base and Isolated Geography: Coronado’s population base is relatively small in comparison to other cities in the region. The City’s ability to compete for retail sales in a trade area beyond Coronado is hampered by is physical separation from San Diego/South Bay proper which, in turn, limits the City’s potential to attract a broad range of national retail tenants. The City’s population growth is stagnant and, at least with respect to retail sales potential, the enlisted and retired military personnel are considered absent because they primarily utilize on-base retail as opposed to Orange Avenue retailers.

•    

High Incomes: Household and per capita incomes in Coronado are very strong, as compared with comparable incomes for the San Diego region. These factors indicate that Coronado residents have above-average amounts of disposable income to spend on goods and services.

•    

Strong Military Presence: Coronado is home to two major military installations, the Naval Amphibious Base (NAB) and Naval Air Station North Island (NASNI.) The base-related workforce is estimated at approximately 35,000, inclusive of enlisted, officers, and civilian workers. Although the military bases provide top-quality on-base retail and services to enlisted and retired military personnel, spill-over demand from the military for services is a positive economic generator for the City.

•    

Exporting Retail Sales Potential: The City is exporting the vast majority of its retail sales potential out of the City. The most recent figures available indicate that Coronado is retaining only 35% of its sales potential. This is due in large part to the presence of the Navy Exchange at North Island Naval Air Station (NASNI) and an abundance of established discount retailers and super-regional malls on the mainland.

•    

Retail Sales Competition: The Navy Exchange at NASNI offers approximately 100,000 square feet of shopping comparable to a Wal-Mart or Target, inclusive of a food court and other amenities. Adjacent to the NASNI Exchange is a 48,000 SF Commissary. The NASNI Exchange offers a standard discount of approximately 17% before sales tax and the Commissary offers a 30% discount. Neither Exchanges nor Commissaries are subject to state or local sales tax regimes. Four regional malls offering nearly five million square feet of anchor stores and in-line space are located within seven miles (or within 25 minutes drive) of Downtown Coronado.

•    

Don’t Compete: The Orange Avenue retail corridor should not attempt to compete with the Navy Exchange at North Island Naval Air Station (NASNI) to recapture General Merchandise sales. The scale of the Exchange and the deep discounts offered to active-duty and retired military personnel residing in Coronado cannot be overcome by the local business district.

•    

Develop Unique Retail: The City should encourage businesses that contribute to create a unique retail environment oriented to one-of-a-kind upscale retail.

•    

Village Theater: It is thought that a single-screen theater can be supported by the local non-military population despite the presence of first-run movies at NASNI. However, finding an operator for a single screen movie theater may be difficult and expensive.

•    

Office Demand: Overall, the office market is healthy with relatively low vacancy throughout. There may be moderate demand for suites larger than 1,000 SF to serve tenants wishing to expand; however, this segment is dominated by real estate agents and financial service firms and is not considered a deep pool of prospective tenants. There is not a significant demand for new office buildings within the Plan area but the City should consider facilitating periodic infusions of office space in mixed-use buildings as warranted by market conditions.

•    

Lack of Assemblage Opportunities: There are few vacant sites within the boundaries of the Plan area that can be combined to form larger development opportunities. Moreover, existing parcels tend to be narrow and deep, fronted by Orange Avenue and backed by multi-unit residential properties.

•    

Disagreement Between City and Business: Many business and property owners expressed the opinion that the City is overly restrictive and un-supportive of the business community. Fair and consistent policies must be established and followed in order to overcome the skepticism regarding the objectives of City government.

B.2.    Specific Plan Vision

The overall vision for the Specific Plan area is to maintain a small town “village” atmosphere for commercial, residential, and civic land uses in a pedestrian-friendly environment that provides a balance between resident and visitor needs.

B.3.    Goals, Objectives and Implementation Strategies / Actions

The following goals and objectives for the Orange Avenue Corridor Specific Plan provide the foundation of the regulatory framework that is implemented through the zoning regulations, development standards, and design criteria. These goals and objectives are intended to complement the analysis of future proposals and design concepts to determine if they are supportive of the spirit and intent of this plan. The implementation strategies support the goals and objectives. Used in conjunction with the development standards and design criteria, they will guide decision makers to determine whether a project will be a contribution or detriment to the desired future of Coronado.

“Goals” and “Objectives” help work toward the “vision” by pointing us in the right direction.

“Implementation Strategies” and “Actions” are specific and measurable. They direct the City in specific ways to reach its goals. This includes not only the goals stated in the Specific Plan, but also the broader goals of the Coronado General Plan (refer to General Plan Consistency discussion in Appendix 3.)

Land Use

GOAL (LU-1): A land use pattern that provides a variety of uses within a pedestrian-friendly environment.

LU-1 OBJECTIVES:

•    

Encourage infill development on small sites and remodeling of existing buildings not likely to be replaced in the near future to make them more pedestrian-oriented and visually distinctive.

•    

Consider expansion of Rotary Park to serve as a large urban community gathering space.

LU-1 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES / ACTIONS:

•    

Limit certain uses that contribute minimally to the pedestrian environment to locations on side streets or the upper stories along Orange Avenue.

GOAL (LU-2): A vibrant Commercial Zone that is visually attractive and compatible with the pedestrian scale small-town “village” atmosphere of Coronado.

LU-2 OBJECTIVES:

•    

Encourage sensitive design that is compatible with the varied architecture, low-rise heights, and narrow storefronts of Downtown.

•    

Create a strong sense of identity for the Commercial Zone through use of banners, distinctive street signage, and enhancement of the landscaped medians.

•    

Establish a comprehensive “wayfinding” system of informational and directional signs to direct vehicular and other travelers to the Commercial Zone and parking facilities.

LU-2 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES / ACTIONS:

•    

Create appropriate development standards and design criteria that promote a high quality image for Downtown.

•    

Retrofit and rehabilitate existing buildings so that they reflect the spirit of Coronado’s past and are compatible with the expressed design criteria for new development.

•    

Continue sidewalk and streetscape improvements in commercial areas.

Mobility / Parking

GOAL (M/P-1): A level of mobility (walking, bicycles, transit and auto) that furthers economic development, convenience, safety, and choice for residents, visitors, and the business community.

GOAL (M/P-2): Parking supply balanced to support the viability of Commercial Zone businesses while minimizing impacts on adjacent residential neighborhoods.

M/P-1 and M/P-2 OBJECTIVES:

•    

Enhance the usability of transit stops.

•    

Maximize on-street parking.

•    

Continue to pursue parking agreements with commercial owners of underutilized parking garages.

M/P-1 and M/P-2 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES / ACTIONS:

•    

Reduce the number of auto trips and congestion on Orange Avenue through better management of parking supply, public transit improvements, and consideration of roadway improvements.

•    

Consider alternatives to on-site parking that allow businesses to satisfy the parking requirements, such as valet parking and shared parking.

•    

Evaluate the need for additional short-term parking spaces on Orange Avenue.

•    

Convert free parking in Isabella’s south median to variable priced metered parking.

•    

Evaluate the need for additional bike racks in the Specific Plan’s commercial areas.

•    

Use Wayfinding signage to direct vehicles to appropriate convenient parking for their specific destination or activity, e.g., beach, shopping.

Economic Development

GOAL (ED-1): An economically sound environment for merchants and property owners, well-balanced in its appeal to both local residents and visitors.

ED-1 OBJECTIVES:

•    

Encourage a unique retail environment oriented to one-of-a-kind upscale retail.

•    

Continue a well-coordinated and funded maintenance program for Downtown sidewalks, streets, and landscaping.

•    

Maintain and expand the pedestrian-oriented retail environment.

•    

Promote retention of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses that are wanted in Coronado.

•    

Retain local retail merchants and attract new retail merchants whose uniqueness will: (a) add to downtown’s ability to offer both merchandise and ambiance that is difficult to duplicate in most shopping centers and other downtowns, (b) help to establish and maintain Downtown Coronado as a significant destination retail location, and (c) serve the retail needs of local residents.

ED-1 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES / ACTIONS:

•    

Revive the Village Theater to serve as an anchor for Downtown.

•    

Exert local leadership authority to outside governmental agencies when beneficial to the economic climate of Coronado.

•    

Develop funding mechanisms, where appropriate and feasible, to implement public improvements and business-improvement activities.

•    

Implement a business recruitment and retention plan.

•    

Develop specific criteria to measure the effectiveness of the Plan over time, such as 5-year increments.