40.460.230 Exemptions from a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
A. General Requirements.
1. Except as specifically exempted by statute, all proposed uses and development occurring within shoreline jurisdiction must conform to Chapter 90.58 RCW, the Act, and this Program.
2. A use or development that is listed as a conditional use pursuant to this Program or is an unclassified use or development must obtain a conditional use permit (Section 40.460.270) even if the development or use does not require a substantial development permit.
3. When a development or use is proposed that does not meet the bulk, dimensional, and/or performance standards of this Program, such development or use shall only be authorized by approval of a shoreline variance (Section 40.460.260) even if the development or use does not require a substantial development permit.
4. If any part of a proposed development requires a shoreline substantial development permit, then a shoreline substantial development permit is required for the entire proposed development project.
5. Exemptions from the requirement to obtain a shoreline substantial development permit shall be construed narrowly. Only those developments that meet the precise terms of one (1) or more of the listed exemptions may be granted exemptions from the substantial development permit process. The burden of proof that a development or use is exempt is on the applicant for the development action.
(Amended: Ord. 2018-11-06; Ord. 2020-12-01)
B. List of Exemptions.
The following activities shall not be considered substantial developments but shall obtain a statement of exemption, as provided for in Section 40.460.230(C):
1. Any development of which the total cost or fair market value does not exceed seven thousand forty-seven dollars ($7,047) or as adjusted by the State Office of Financial Management, if such development does not materially interfere with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the state. For purposes of determining whether or not a permit is required, the total cost or fair market value shall be based on the value of development that is occurring on shorelines of the state as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(e). The total cost or fair market value of the development shall include the fair market value of any donated, contributed, or found labor, equipment or materials.
2. Subject to the provisions of Section 40.460.250, normal maintenance or repair of existing legally established structures or developments, including those that have been damaged by accident, fire, or elements. The features of the repaired structure or development, including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location, and external appearance, must be comparable to the original structure or development, and the repair must not cause substantial adverse effects to shoreline resources or environment. The replacement of demolished existing single-family residences and their appurtenances is not considered normal maintenance and repair.
3. Construction of a normal protective bulkhead common to single-family residences. A “normal protective” bulkhead includes those structural and nonstructural developments installed at or near, and parallel to, the ordinary high water mark for the sole purpose of protecting an existing single-family residence and appurtenant structures from loss or damage by erosion. A normal protective bulkhead is not exempt if constructed for the purpose of creating dry land. When a vertical or near vertical wall is being constructed or reconstructed, not more than one (1) cubic yard of fill per one (1) foot of wall may be used as backfill. When an existing bulkhead is being repaired by construction of a vertical wall fronting the existing wall, it shall be constructed no further waterward of the existing bulkhead than is necessary for construction of new footings. When a bulkhead has deteriorated such that an ordinary high water mark has been established by the presence and action of water landward of the bulkhead then the replacement bulkhead must be located at or near the actual ordinary high water mark. Beach nourishment and bioengineered erosion control projects may be considered a normal protective bulkhead when any structural elements are consistent with the above requirements and when the project has been approved by the Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW).
4. Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the elements. An “emergency” is an unanticipated and imminent threat to public health, safety, or the environment that requires immediate action within a time too short to allow full compliance with this chapter. Emergency construction does not include development of new permanent protective structures where none previously existed. Where new protective structures are deemed by the Shoreline Administrator to be the appropriate means to address the emergency situation, upon abatement of the emergency situation the new structure shall be removed or any permit that would have been required, absent an emergency, pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, these regulations, or this Program, shall be obtained. All emergency construction shall be consistent with the policies and requirements of this chapter, Chapter 90.58 RCW, and this Program. As a general matter, flooding or other seasonal events that can be anticipated and may occur but that are not imminent are not an emergency.
5. Construction and practices normal or necessary for farming, irrigation, and ranching activities, including agricultural service roads and utilities on shorelands, and the construction and maintenance of irrigation structures including but not limited to head gates, pumping facilities, and irrigation channels. A feedlot of any size, all processing plants, other activities of a commercial nature, alteration of the contour of the shorelands by leveling or filling other than that which results from normal cultivation shall not be considered normal or necessary farming or ranching activities.
6. Construction or modification of navigational aids such as channel markers and anchor buoys.
7. Construction on shorelands by an owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single-family residence or appurtenance for their own use or for the use of their family, which residence does not exceed a height of thirty-five (35) feet above average grade level, and which meets all requirements of the county, other than requirements imposed pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. Construction authorized under this exemption shall be located landward of the ordinary high water mark.
8. Construction of a dock, including a community dock, designed for pleasure craft only, for the private noncommercial use of the owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single-family or multifamily residence. This exception applies if either:
a. The dock is a new dock, and the fair market value of the dock does not exceed eleven thousand two hundred dollars ($11,200) or an adjustment to that figure made by the State Office of Financial Management; or
b. The dock is a replacement dock that is constructed to replace an existing dock and is of equal or lesser square footage than the replaced dock, and the replacement dock has a fair market value that does not exceed twenty-two thousand five hundred ($22,500) dollars or an adjustment to that figure made by the State Office of Financial Management.
However, if subsequent construction occurs within five (5) years of completion of the prior construction that was exempt pursuant to this provision, and the combined fair market value of the subsequent and prior construction exceeds the applicable amount specified in either subsection (B)(8)(a) or (b) of this section, the subsequent construction shall be considered a substantial development.
9. Operation, maintenance, or construction of canals, waterways, drains, reservoirs, or other facilities that now exist or are hereafter created or developed as a part of an irrigation system for the primary purpose of making use of system waters, including return flow and artificially stored ground water from the irrigation of lands.
10. The marking of property lines or corners on state-owned lands, when such marking does not significantly interfere with normal public use of the surface of the water.
11. Operation and maintenance of any system of dikes, ditches, drains, or other facilities existing on September 8, 1975, that were created, developed or utilized primarily as a part of an agricultural drainage or diking system.
12. Site exploration and investigation activities that are prerequisite to preparation of an application for development authorization under this chapter, if:
a. The activity does not interfere with the normal public use of surface waters;
b. The activity will have no significant adverse impact on the environment including but not limited to fish, wildlife, fish or wildlife habitat, water quality, and aesthetic values;
c. The activity does not involve the installation of any structure, and upon completion of the activity the vegetation and land configuration of the site are restored to conditions existing before the activity; and
d. A private entity seeking development authorization under this section first posts a performance bond or provides other evidence of financial responsibility to the local jurisdiction to assure that the site is restored to preexisting conditions.
13. The process of removing or controlling aquatic noxious weeds, as defined in RCW 17.26.020, through the use of an herbicide or other treatment methods applicable to weed control published by the Departments of Agriculture or Ecology jointly with other state agencies under Chapter 43.21C RCW.
14. Watershed restoration projects as defined in RCW 89.08.460.
15. a. A public or private project that is designed to improve fish or wildlife habitat or fish passage when all of the following apply:
(1) The project has been approved by WDFW;
(2) The project has received hydraulic project approval (HPA) by WDFW pursuant to Chapter 77.55 RCW; and
(3) Clark County has determined that the project is substantially consistent with the local Shoreline Master Program. Clark County shall make such determination in a timely manner and provide it by letter to the applicant.
b. Fish habitat enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of RCW 77.55.181 are determined to be consistent with local Shoreline Master Programs and do not require a statement of exemption.
16. Other than conversions to nonforest land use, forest practices regulated under Chapter 76.09 RCW are not subject to additional regulations under the Act or this Program (Section 40.460.630(E)).
17. The external or internal retrofitting of an existing structure for the exclusive purpose of compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.) or to otherwise provide physical access to the structure by individuals with disabilities (RCW 90.58.030(3)(e)(xiii)).
(Amended: Ord. 2015-12-12; Ord. 2018-11-06; Ord. 2020-12-01)
C. Statements of Exemption.
1. Any person claiming exemption from the substantial development permit requirements shall make an application to the Shoreline Administrator for such an exemption in the manner prescribed by the Shoreline Administrator, except that no written statement of exemption is required either for a project designed to improve fish or wildlife habitat or fish passage pursuant to WAC 173-27-040(2)(p)(iii)(A), or for emergency development pursuant to WAC 173-27-040(2)(d).
2. The Shoreline Administrator is authorized to grant or deny requests for statements of exemption from the shoreline substantial development permit requirement for uses and developments within shorelines that are specifically listed in Section 40.460.230(B). The statement shall be in writing and shall indicate the specific exemption of this Program that is being applied to the development, and shall provide a summary of the Shoreline Administrator’s analysis of the consistency of the project with this Program and the Act. The letter shall be sent to the applicant and maintained on file in the offices of the Shoreline Administrator.
3. Statements of exemption may contain conditions and/or mitigating measures of approval to achieve consistency and compliance with the provisions of this Program and the Act.
4. A denial of an exemption shall be in writing and shall identify the reason(s) for the denial. The Shoreline Administrator’s decision on a statement of exemption is not subject to administrative appeal.
5. Exempt activities shall not be conducted until a statement of exemption has been obtained from the Shoreline Administrator.
(Amended: Ord. 2012-07-16; Ord. 2015-12-12; Ord. 2018-01-01; Ord. 2020-12-01)