Chapter 14.10
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY

Sections:

14.10.010    Title.

14.10.020    Application.

14.10.030    Purpose.

14.10.040    Authority.

14.10.050    Basic requirements and adoption by reference.

14.10.060    Additional definitions.

14.10.070    Designation of responsible official.

14.10.080    Lead agency determination and responsibilities.

14.10.090    Transfer of lead agency status to a state agency.

14.10.100    Additional consideration in time limits applicable to the SEPA process.

14.10.110    Categorical exemptions and threshold determinations, purpose and adoption by reference.

14.10.120    Flexible threshold for categorical exemptions.

14.10.130    Use of exemptions.

14.10.140    Environmental checklist.

14.10.150    Mitigated DNS.

14.10.160    Environmental impact statements (EIS) – Purpose and adoption by reference.

14.10.170    Preparation of EIS – Additional considerations.

14.10.180    Additional elements to be covered in an EIS.

14.10.190    Commenting, adoption by reference.

14.10.200    Public notice.

14.10.210    Designation of official to perform consulted agency responsibilities for the city.

14.10.220    Using existing environmental documents, purpose of this part and adoption by reference.

14.10.230    SEPA and agency decisions, purpose and adoption by reference.

14.10.240    Substantive authority.

14.10.250    SEPA appeals.

14.10.260    Planned action.

14.10.270    Notice/statute of limitations.

14.10.280    Definitions – Purpose of this part and adoption by reference.

14.10.290    Agency compliance, purpose and adoption by reference.

14.10.300    Form – Adoption by reference.

14.10.010 Title.

This chapter shall be called “Environmental Policy.” (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.020 Application.

The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all proposals as defined in chapter 197-11 WAC where the city is presented with an application or has a goal and is actively preparing to make a decision on the means of accomplishing that goal and environmental impacts can be reasonably identified.

Application of this chapter shall be implemented in a manner consistent with WAC 197-11-055. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.030 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to establish uniform requirements for compliance with chapter 43.21C RCW and chapter 197-11 WAC, in a manner that is consistent with the provisions of WAC 197-11-020 and 197-11-030. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.040 Authority.

A. The city adopts the ordinance codified in this chapter under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C.120, and the SEPA rules, chapter 197-11 WAC, chapter 36.70A RCW, and other applicable laws and regulations.

B. This chapter contains the city’s SEPA procedures and policies.

C. The SEPA rules, chapter 197-11 WAC, must be used in conjunction with this chapter. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.050 Basic requirements and adoption by reference.

This part contains the basic requirements that apply to the SEPA process. This city adopts the following sections of chapter 197-11 WAC by reference:

WAC

197-11-040    Definitions.

197-11-050    Lead agency.

197-11-060    Content of environmental review.

197-11-070    Limitations on actions during SEPA process.

197-11-080    Incomplete or unavailable information.

197-11-090    Supporting documents.

197-11-100    Information required of applicants.

197-11-158    SEPA/GMA project review – Reliance on existing plans, laws, and regulations.

197-11-210    SEPA/GMA integration.

197-11-220    SEPA/GMA definitions.

197-11-228    Overall SEPA/GMA integration procedures.

197-11-230    Timing of an integrated SEPA/GMA process.

197-11-232    SEPA/GMA integration procedures for preliminary planning, environmental analysis, and expanded scoping.

197-11-235    SEPA/GMA integration documents.

197-11-238    SEPA/GMA monitoring.

197-11-250    SEPA/Model Toxics Control Act integration.

197-11-253    SEPA lead agency for MTCA actions.

197-11-256    Preliminary evaluation.

197-11-259    Determination of nonsignificance for MTCA remedial actions.

197-11-262    Determination of significance and EIS for MTCA remedial actions.

197-11-265    Early scoping for MTCA actions.

197-11-268    MTCA interim actions.

(Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.060 Additional definitions.

In addition to those definitions contained within WAC 197-11-220 and 197-11-700 through 197-11-799, when used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context indicates otherwise:

A. “Department” means any division, subdivision or organizational unit of the city established by ordinance, rule or order.

B. “SEPA rules” means chapter 197-11 WAC adopted by the Department of Ecology.

C. “Ordinance” means the ordinance, resolution, or other procedure used by the city to adopt regulatory requirements.

D. “Early notice” means the city’s response to an applicant stating whether it considers issuance of a determination of significance likely for the applicant’s proposal (mitigated determination of nonsignificance (DNS) procedures). (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.070 Designation of responsible official.

A. For those proposals for which the city is the lead agency, the responsible official shall be the community development director.

B. For all proposals for which the city is the lead agency, the responsible official shall make the threshold determination, supervise scoping and preparation of any required environmental impact statement (EIS), and perform any other functions assigned to the “lead agency” or “responsible official” by those sections of the SEPA rules that were adopted by reference in BMC 14.10.050.

C. The city shall retain all documents required by the SEPA rules (chapter 197-11 WAC) and make them available in accordance with chapter 42.56 RCW. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.080 Lead agency determination and responsibilities.

A. If the city receives an application for or initiates a proposal that involves a nonexempt action, the city shall determine the lead agency for that proposal under WAC 197-11-050, 197-11-253, and 197-11-922 through 197-11-940, unless the lead agency has been previously determined or the city is aware that another agency is in the process of determining the lead agency.

B. When the city is not the lead agency for a proposal, the city shall use and consider, as appropriate, either the DNS or the final EIS of the lead agency in making decisions on the proposal. The city shall not prepare or require preparation of a DNS or EIS in addition to that prepared by the lead agency, unless required under WAC 197-11-600. In some cases, the city may conduct supplemental environmental review under WAC 197-11-600.

C. If the city receives a lead agency determination made by another agency that appears inconsistent with the criteria of WAC 197-11-253 or 197-11-922 through 197-11-940, it may object to the determination. Any objection must be made to the agency originally making the determination and resolved within 15 days of receipt of the determination, or the city must petition the Department of Ecology for a lead agency determination under WAC 197-11-946 within the 15-day time period. Any such petition on behalf of the city may be initiated by the responsible official.

D. The city is authorized to make agreements as to lead agency status or shared lead agency duties for a proposal under WAC 197-11-942 and 197-11-944; provided, that the responsible official and any city department that will incur responsibilities as the result of such agreement approve the agreement.

E. The city, in making a lead agency determination for a private project, shall require sufficient information from the applicant to identify which other agencies have jurisdiction over the proposal (that is: which agencies require nonexempt licenses?).

F. When the city/county is lead agency for a MTCA remedial action, the Department of Ecology shall be provided with an opportunity under WAC 197-11-253(5) to review the environmental documents prior to public notice being provided. If the SEPA and MTCA documents are issued together with one public comment period under WAC 197-11-253(6). The city/county shall decide jointly with Ecology who receives the comment letters and how copies of the comment letters will be distributed to the other agency. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.090 Transfer of lead agency status to a state agency.

For any proposal for a private project where the city would be the lead agency and for which one or more state agencies have jurisdiction, the city’s responsible official may elect to transfer the lead agency duties to a state agency. The state agency with jurisdiction appearing first on the priority listing in WAC 197-11-936 shall be the lead agency and the city shall be an agency with jurisdiction. To transfer lead agency duties, the city’s responsible official must transmit a notice of the transfer together with any relevant information available on the proposal to the appropriate state agency with jurisdiction. The responsible official of the city shall also give notice of the transfer to the private applicant and any other agencies with jurisdiction over the proposal. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.100 Additional consideration in time limits applicable to the SEPA process.

Time estimates contained in this section (expressed in calendar days) shall apply when the city processes licenses for all private projects and those governmental proposals submitted to the city by other agencies. The actual time may vary with the complexity of the project, availability of staff, cooperation of agencies with jurisdiction or expertise, etc. The time estimates contained herein shall not be construed to be mandatory. Time periods for making threshold determinations shall commence upon payment of fees.

A. Categorical Exemptions. The city will normally identify whether an action is categorically exempt within seven days of receiving a completed application.

B. Threshold Determinations.

1. For project actions involving the issuance of a city license or permit the city shall make a threshold determination on a completed application using the optional DNS process provided for in WAC 197-11-355 unless the responsible official determines the proposed action is unusually complex or significant uncertainties exist with respect to potential environmental impacts.

2. For projects where the optional DNS process is used the city shall issue a threshold determination together with the notice of application required by BMC Title 14A.

3. If the optional DNS process provided for in WAC 197-11-355 is not used, the city will normally complete threshold determinations that can be based solely upon review of the environmental checklist for the proposal within 15 days of the date an applicant’s completed application and completed checklist are submitted.

4. When the responsible official requires further information from the applicant or consultation with other agencies with jurisdictions:

a. The city will normally request such further information within 15 days of receiving a completed application and completed environmental checklist;

b. The city will normally wait no longer than 30 days for a consulted agency to respond;

c. The responsible official will normally complete the threshold determination within 15 days of receiving the requested information from the applicant or the consulted agency.

5. When the city must initiate further studies, including field investigations, to obtain the information to make the threshold determination, the city will normally complete the studies within 30 days of receiving a completed application and a completed checklist.

6. The city will normally complete threshold determinations on actions where the applicant recommends in writing that an EIS be prepared, because of the probable significant adverse environmental impact(s) described in the application, within 15 days of receiving a completed application and completed checklist. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.110 Categorical exemptions and threshold determinations, purpose and adoption by reference.

This part contains the rules for deciding whether a proposal has a “probable significant, adverse environmental impact” requiring an environmental impact statement (EIS) to be prepared. This part also contains rules for evaluating the impacts of proposals not requiring an EIS. The city adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented in this part:

WAC

197-11-300    Purpose of this part.

197-11-305    Categorical exemptions.

197-11-310    Threshold determination required.

197-11-315    Environmental checklist.

197-11-330    Threshold determination process.

197-11-335    Additional information.

197-11-340    Determination of nonsignificance (DNS).

197-11-350    Mitigated DNS (MDNS).

197-11-355    Optional DNS process.

197-11-360    Determination of significance (DS)/initiating of scoping.

197-11-390    Effect of threshold determination.

197-11-800    Categorical exemptions.

197-11-880    Emergencies.

197-11-890    Petitioning DOE to change exemptions.

(Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.120 Flexible threshold for categorical exemptions.

Categorical exemptions are adopted by reference under BMC 14.10.110. The city establishes the following exempt levels for minor new construction under WAC 197-11-800(1)(b) based on local conditions:

A. For residential dwelling units in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i): nine units;

B. For agriculture structures in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(ii): 10,000 square feet;

C. For office, school, commercial, recreational, service or storage buildings in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(iii): 4,000 square feet and 20 parking spaces;

D. For parking lots in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(iv): 20 parking spaces;

E. For landfills and excavations in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(v): 100 cubic yards;

F. Demolition of any structure or facility up to the maximum exempt level provided in WAC 197-11-800;

G. Replacement, addition of up to 20 percent of gross floor area, alteration or modification of an existing commercial structure, up to 12,000 square feet. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.130 Use of exemptions.

A. Upon receiving an application for a license or, in the case of governmental proposals, the department initiating the proposal, the city shall determine whether the license and/or the proposal is exempt. The city’s determination that a proposal is exempt shall be final and not subject to administrative review. If a proposal is exempt, none of the procedural requirements of this chapter shall apply to the proposal.

B. In determining whether or not a proposal is exempt, the city shall make certain the proposal is properly defined and shall identify the governmental licenses required (WAC 197-11-060). If a proposal includes exempt and nonexempt actions, the city shall determine the lead agency, even if the license application that triggers the city’s consideration is exempt.

C. If a proposal includes both exempt and nonexempt actions, the city may authorize exempt actions prior to compliance with the procedural requirements of this chapter, except that:

1. The city shall not give authorization for:

a. Any nonexempt action; or

b. Any action that would have an adverse environmental impact; or

c. Any action that would limit the choice of alternatives; or

d. Any combination of exempt activities which when considered together would not be exempt.

2. The city may withhold approval of an exempt action that would lead to modification of the physical environment, when such modification would serve no purpose if nonexempt action(s) were not approved.

3. The city may withhold approval of exempt actions that would lead to substantial financial expenditures by a private applicant when the expenditures would serve no purpose if nonexempt action(s) were not approved.

D. Proposed short subdivision of land that is adjacent to previous short subdivisions or adjacent to land on which a subdivision is pending shall not be exempt if adjacent subdivisions share any improvements or access easements. In such cases, the proposed short plat will be considered physically or functionally related regardless of ownership. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.140 Environmental checklist.

A. Except as provided in subsection (C) of this section, a completed environmental checklist (or a copy), in the form provided in WAC 197-11-960, shall be filed at the same time as an application for a permit, license, certificate, or other approval not specifically exempted in this chapter; provided, that a checklist is not needed if the city and applicant agree an EIS is required, SEPA compliance has been completed, or SEPA compliance has been initiated by another agency. The city shall use the environmental checklist to determine the lead agency and if the city is the lead agency, for determining the responsible official and for making the threshold determination.

B. For private proposals, the city will require the applicant to complete the environmental checklist, providing assistance as necessary. For city proposals, the department initiating the proposal shall complete the environmental checklist for that proposal.

C. For projects submitted as planned actions under WAC 197-11-164, the city shall use its existing environmental checklist form or may modify the environmental checklist form as provided in WAC 197-11-315. The modified environmental checklist form may be prepared and adopted along with or as part of a planned action ordinance; or developed after the ordinance is adopted. In either case, a proposed modified environmental checklist form must be sent to the Department of Ecology to allow at least a 30-day review prior to use. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.150 Mitigated DNS.

A. As provided in this section and in WAC 197-11-350, the responsible official may issue a DNS based on conditions attached to the proposal by the responsible official or on changes to, or clarifications of, the proposal made by the applicant.

B. An applicant may request in writing early notice of whether a DS is likely under WAC 197-11-350. The request must:

1. Follow submission of a permit application and environmental checklist for a nonexempt proposal for which the city is lead agency; and

2. Precede the city’s actual threshold determination for the proposal.

C. The responsible official should respond to the request for early notice within 15 working days. The response shall:

1. Be written;

2. State whether the city currently considers issuance of a DS likely and, if so, indicate the general or specific areas of concern that are leading the city to consider a DS; and

3. State that the applicant may change or clarify the proposal to mitigate the indicated impacts, revising the environmental checklist and/or permit application as necessary to reflect the changes or clarifications.

D. As much as possible, the city should assist the applicant with identification of impacts to the extent necessary to formulate mitigation measures.

E. When the applicant submits a changed or clarified proposal along with a revised or amended environmental checklist, the city shall base its threshold determination on the changed or clarified proposal and should make the determination within 15 days of receiving the changed or clarified proposal.

1. If the city indicated specific mitigation measures in its response to the request for early notice, and the applicant changed or clarified the proposal to include those specific mitigation measures, the city shall issue and circulate a DNS under WAC 197-11-340(2).

2. If the city indicated areas of concern, but did not indicate specific mitigation measures that would allow it to issue a DNS, the city shall make the threshold determination, issuing a DNS or DS as appropriate.

3. The applicant’s proposed mitigation measures (clarifications, changes or conditions) must be in writing and must be specific. For example, proposals to “control noise” or “prevent storm water runoff” are inadequate whereas proposals to “muffle machinery to X decibel” or “construct 200-foot storm water retention pond at Y location” are adequate.

4. Mitigation measures which justify issuance of a mitigated DNS may be incorporated in the DNS by reference to agency staff reports, studies or other documents.

F. A mitigated DNS is issued either under WAC 197-11-340(2), requiring a 14-day comment period and public notice, or under WAC 197-11-335, which may require no additional comment period beyond the comment period on the notice of application.

G. Mitigation measures incorporated in the mitigated DNS shall be deemed conditions of approval of the permit decision· and may be enforced in the same manner as any term or condition of the permit, or enforced in any manner specifically prescribed by the city. Failure to comply with the designated mitigation measures shall be grounds for suspension and/or revocation of any issued license or permit.

H. If the city’s tentative decision on a permit or approval does not include mitigation measures that were incorporated in a mitigated DNS for the proposal, the city should evaluate the threshold determination to assure consistency with WAC 197-11-340(3)(a) (Withdrawal of DNS).

I. The city’s written response under subsection (B) of this section shall not be construed as a determination of significance. In addition, preliminary discussions of clarifications or changes to a proposal, as opposed to a written request for early notice, shall not bind the city to consider the clarifications or changes in its threshold determination. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.160 Environmental impact statements (EIS) – Purpose and adoption by reference.

This part contains the rules for preparing environmental impact statements. The city adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented by this part:

WAC

197-11-400    Purpose of EIS.

197-11-402    General requirements.

197-11-405    EIS types.

197-11-406    EIS timing.

197-11-408    Scoping.

197-11-410    Expanded scoping (optional).

197-11-420    EIS preparation.

197-11-425    Style and size.

197-11-430    Format.

197-11-435    Cover letter or memo.

197-11-440    EIS contents.

197-11-442    Contents of EIS on nonproject proposals.

197-11-443    EIS contents when prior nonproject EIS.

197-11-444    Elements of the environment.

197-11-448    Relationship of EIS to other considerations.

197-11-450    Cost-benefit analysis.

197-11-455    Issuance of DEIS.

197-11-460    Issuance of FEIS.

(Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.170 Preparation of EIS – Additional considerations.

A. Preparation of draft and final EISs (DEIS and FEIS) and draft and final supplemental EISs (SEIS) is the responsibility of the city under the direction of the responsible official. Before the city issues an EIS, the responsible official shall be satisfied that it complies with this chapter and chapter 197-11 WAC.

B. The DEIS and FEIS or draft and final SEIS shall be prepared by city staff, the applicant, or by a consultant selected by the city or the applicant. A consultant selected by the applicant requires written approval by the city to ensure compliance with the provisions of chapter 43.21C RCW and chapter 197-11 WAC. (See WAC 197-11-420(1) through (4).) If the responsible official requires an EIS for a proposal and determines that someone other than the city will prepare the EIS, the responsible official shall notify the applicant immediately after completion of the threshold determination. The responsible official shall also notify the applicant of the city’s procedure for EIS preparation, including approval of the DEIS and FEIS prior to distribution.

C. The city may require an applicant to provide information the city does not possess, including specific investigations. However, the applicant is not required to supply information that is not required under this chapter or that is being requested from another agency. (This does not apply to information the city may request under another ordinance or statute.)

D. The environmental impact statement may be combined with the recommendation or report on the proposal or issued as a separate document. The substantive decisions or recommendations shall be clearly identifiable in the combined document.

E. The applicant shall be responsible for reimbursing or compensating the city for all costs associated with the preparation of draft and final EISs (DEIS and FEIS) and draft and final supplemental EISs (SEIS). Work shall not proceed on such documents until arrangements for all associated costs have been made and approved in writing by the city. (See WAC 197-11-420 and 197-11-914.) (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.180 Additional elements to be covered in an EIS.

The following additional elements are part of the environment for the purpose of EIS content, but do not add to the criteria for threshold determinations or perform any other function or purpose under this chapter:

A. Economy of the area;

B. Social policy analysis;

C. Cost-benefit analysis;

D. Such other elements as may be required by the responsible official. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.190 Commenting, adoption by reference.

This part contains rules for consulting, commenting, and responding on all environmental documents under SEPA, including rules for public notice and hearings. The city adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented in this part:

WAC

197-11-500    Purpose of this part.

197-11-502    Inviting comment.

197-11-504    Availability and cost of environmental documents.

197-11-508    SEPA register.

197-11-510    Public notice.

197-11-535    Public hearings and meetings.

197-11-545    Effect of no comment.

197-11-550    Specificity of comments.

197-11-560    FEIS response to comments.

197-11-570    Consulted agency costs to assist lead agency.

(Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.200 Public notice.

A. Whenever the city issues a DNS under WAC 197-11-340(2) or a DS under WAC 197-11-360(3) the city shall give public notice as required by chapter 14A.05 BMC.

B. Whenever the city issues a DNS or MDNS under WAC 197-11-355 the city shall combine the SEPA threshold determination notice and the notice of application required by BMC Title 14A and issue a single notice using the timelines and procedures prescribed by BMC Title 14A. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.210 Designation of official to perform consulted agency responsibilities for the city.

A. The responsible official shall be responsible for preparation of written comments for the city in response to a consultation request prior to a threshold determination, participation in scoping, and reviewing a DEIS.

B. The responsible official shall be responsible for the city’s compliance with WAC 197-11-550 whenever the city is a consulted agency and is authorized to develop operating procedures that will ensure that responses to consultation requests are prepared in a timely fashion and include data from all appropriate city departments. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.220 Using existing environmental documents, purpose of this part and adoption by reference.

This part contains rules for using and supplementing existing environmental documents prepared under SEPA or National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for the city’s own environmental compliance. The city adopts the following sections by reference:

WAC

197-11-164    Planned actions – Definition and criteria.

197-11-168    Ordinances or resolutions designating planned actions – Procedures for adoption.

197-11-172    Planned actions – Project review.

197-11-600    When to use existing environmental documents.

197-11-610    Use of NEPA documents.

197-11-620    Supplemental environmental impact statement – Procedures.

197-11-625    Addenda – Procedures.

197-11-630    Adoption – Procedures.

197-11-635    Incorporation by reference – Procedures.

197-11-640    Combining documents.

(Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.230 SEPA and agency decisions, purpose and adoption by reference.

This part contains rules (and policies) for SEPA’s substantive authority, such as decisions to mitigate or reject proposals as a result of SEPA. This part also contains procedures for appealing SEPA determinations to agencies or the courts. The city adopts the following sections by reference:

WAC

197-11-650    Purpose of this part.

197-11-655    Implementation.

197-11-660    Substantive authority and mitigation.

197-11-680    Appeals.

(Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.240 Substantive authority.

A. The policies and goals set forth in this chapter are supplementary to those set forth in chapter 43.21C RCW and chapter 197-11 WAC and those identified in subsection (D) of this section.

B. The city may attach conditions to a permit or approval for a proposal so long as:

1. Such conditions are necessary to mitigate specific probable adverse environmental impacts identified in environmental documents prepared pursuant to this chapter; and

2. Such conditions are in writing; and

3. The conditions or mitigation measures included in such conditions are reasonable and capable of being accomplished; and

4. The city has considered whether other local, state, or federal mitigation measures applied to the proposal are sufficient to mitigate the identified impacts; and

5. Such conditions are based on one or more policies in subsection (D) of this section and cited in the license or other decision document.

C. The city may deny a permit or approval for a proposal on the basis of SEPA so long as:

1. A finding is made that approving the proposal would result in probable significant adverse environmental impacts that are identified in a FEIS or final SEIS prepared pursuant to this chapter; and

2. A finding is made that no reasonable mitigation measures are capable of being accomplished that are sufficient to mitigate the identified impact; and

3. The denial is based on one or more policies identified in subsection (D) of this section and identified in writing in the decision document. (Chapter 43.21C RCW and chapter 197-11 WAC.)

D. The city designates and adopts by reference the following policies as the basis for the city’s exercise of authority pursuant to this section:

1. The city shall use all practicable means, consistent with other essential considerations of state policy, to improve and coordinate plans, functions, programs, and resources to the end that the state and its citizens may:

a. Fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustee of the environment for succeeding generations;

b. Assure for all people of Washington safe, healthful, productive, and aesthetically and culturally pleasing surroundings;

c. Attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the environment without degradation, risk to health or safety, or other undesirable and unintended consequences;

d. Preserve important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our national heritage;

e. Maintain, whenever possible, an environment which supports diversity and variety of individual choice;

f. Achieve a balance between population and resource use which will permit high standards of living and a wide sharing of life’s amenities; and

g. Enhance the quality of renewable resources and approach the maximum attainable recycling of depletable resources.

2. The city recognizes that each person has a fundamental and inalienable right to a healthful environment and that each person has a responsibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the environment.

3. The city adopts by reference the policies in the following:

a. Burlington Municipal Code, including all chapters contained in BMC Title 15, Buildings and Construction, as may be further amended;

b. Burlington Comprehensive Plan dated June 1994, and map, as may be further amended;

c. Shoreline Management Act, as may be further amended;

d. Growth Management Act, as may be further amended;

e. Forest Practice Act and regulations as may be further amended. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.250 SEPA appeals.

A. Any person may appeal the issuance of:

1. A determination of nonsignificance;

2. A determination of significance when issued in conjunction with a project permit; or

3. A final environmental impact statement.

The appeal of a SEPA decision not requiring a legislative decision, conditioning or denying a proposal, to the city council as set forth in RCW 43.21C.060, shall only be available where expressly provided for in this section.

B. An appeal must be filed in writing with the responsible official (WAC 197-11-680) within 14 calendar days of the date the decision becomes final. The appeal shall identify the decision, contain a summary of the grounds for the appeal and be accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount established by the adopted fee ordinance or applicable resolution. Following receipt of the appeal and the fee, the responsible official shall transmit a copy of the appeal to the hearing examiner, unless the decision is made by the hearing examiner, in which case an appeal shall go directly to city council or to whatever authority that has jurisdiction over the underlying action.

C. Because a major purpose of this chapter is to combine environmental considerations with public decisions, any appeal brought under this chapter shall be linked to the appeal of a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act provides a basis for challenging whether governmental action is in compliance with the substantive and procedural provisions of this chapter. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action.

D. Unless otherwise provided by this section:

1. Appeals under this chapter shall be of the governmental action together with its accompanying environmental determinations.

2. Appeals of environmental determinations made or the lack thereof under this chapter shall be combined with and commenced within the time and in the manner required to appeal the governmental action which is subject to environmental review, pursuant to chapter 14A.05 BMC.

3. An appeal of a determination of significance may be filed as set forth above, prior to and separate from a final hearing and determination of a project action and a determination of nonsignificance of a nonproject action initiated by the city may also be made independent of the underlying action, in the manner set forth in subsection (B) of this section. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.260 Planned action.

A. A planned action, as provided for in subsection (B) of this section, does not require a threshold determination or the preparation of an environmental impact statement under this chapter, but is subject to environmental review and mitigation as provided in this chapter.

B. 1. For purposes of this section, a “planned action” means one or more types of project action that:

a. Are designated planned actions by an ordinance or resolution adopted by a county, city or town planning under RCW 36.70A.040;

b. Have had the significant impacts adequately addressed in an environmental impact statement prepared in conjunction with (i) a comprehensive plan or subarea plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, or (ii) a phased project;

c. Are subsequent or implementing projects for the proposals listed in subsection (B)(1)(b) of this subsection;

d. Are located within an urban growth area, as defined in RCW 36.70A.030;

e. Are not essential public facilities, as defined in RCW 36.70A.200; and

f. Are consistent with the comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW.

2. The city shall limit planned actions to development or specific geographical areas that are less extensive than the jurisdictional boundaries of the city and may limit a planned action to a time period identified in the environmental impact statement or the ordinance or resolution adopted under this subsection. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.270 Notice/statute of limitations.

A. The city, applicant for, or proponent of an action may publish a notice of action pursuant to RCW 43.21C.080 for any action.

B. The form of the notice shall be substantially in the form provided in WAC 197-11-990. The notice shall be published by the city clerk, applicant or proponent pursuant to RCW 43.21C.080. (Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.280 Definitions – Purpose of this part and adoption by reference.

This part contains uniform usage and definitions of terms under SEPA. The city adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented by BMC 14.10.060:

WAC

197-11-700    Definitions.

197-11-702    Act.

197-11-704    Action.

197-11-706    Addendum.

197-11-708    Adoption.

197-11-710    Affected tribe.

197-11-712    Affecting.

197-11-714    Agency.

197-11-716    Applicant.

197-11-718    Built environment.

197-11-720    Categorical exemption.

197-11-721    Closed record appeal.

197-11-722    Consolidated appeal.

197-11-724    Consulted agency.

197-11-726    Cost-benefit analysis.

197-11-728    County/city.

197-11-730    Decision maker.

197-11-732    Department.

197-11-734    Determination of nonsignificance (DNS).

197-11-736    Determination of significance (DS).

197-11-738    EIS.

197-11-740    Environment.

197-11-742    Environmental checklist.

197-11-744    Environmental document.

197-11-746    Environmental review.

197-11-750    Expanded scoping.

197-11-752    Impacts.

197-11-754    Incorporation by reference.

197-11-756    Lands covered by water.

197-11-758    Lead agency.

197-11-760    License.

197-11-762    Local agency.

197-11-764    Major action.

197-11-766    Mitigated DNS.

197-11-768    Mitigation.

197-11-770    Natural environment.

197-11-772    NEPA.

197-11-774    Nonproject.

197-11-775    Open record hearing.

197-11-776    Phased review.

197-11-778    Preparation.

197-11-780    Private project.

197-11-782    Probable.

197-11-784    Proposal.

197-11-786    Reasonable alternative.

197-11-788    Responsible official.

197-11-790    SEPA.

197-11-792    Scope.

197-11-793    Scoping.

197-11-794    Significant.

197-11-796    State agency.

197-11-797    Threshold determination.

197-11-799    Underlying governmental action.

(Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.290 Agency compliance, purpose and adoption by reference.

This part contains rules for agency compliance with SEPA, including rules for charging fees under the SEPA process, designating categorical exemptions which do not apply within critical areas, listing agencies with environmental expertise, selecting the lead agency, and applying these rules to current agency activities. The city adopts the following sections by reference:

WAC

197-11-900    Purpose of this part.

197-11-902    Agency SEPA policies.

197-11-916    Application to ongoing actions.

197-11-920    Agencies with environmental expertise.

197-11-922    Lead agency rules.

197-11-924    Determining the lead agency.

197-11-926    Lead agency for governmental proposals.

197-11-928    Lead agency for public and private proposals.

197-11-930    Lead agency for private projects with one agency with jurisdiction.

197-11-932    Lead agency for private projects requiring licensing from more than one agency, when one of the agencies is county/city.

197-11-934    Lead agency for private projects requiring licenses from a local agency, not a county/city, and one or more state agencies.

197-11-936    Lead agency for private projects requiring licenses from more than one state agency.

197-11-938    Lead agencies for specific proposals.

197-11-940    Transfer of lead agency status to a state agency.

197-11-942    Agreements on lead agency status.

197-11-944    Agreements on division of lead agency duties.

197-11-946    DOE resolution of lead agency disputes.

197-11-948    Assumption of lead agency status.

(Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).

14.10.300 Form – Adoption by reference.

The city adopts the following forms and sections by reference:

WAC

197-11-960    Environmental checklist.

197-11-965    Adoption notice.

197-11-970    Determination of nonsignificance (DNS).

197-11-980    Determination of significance and scoping notice (DS).

197-11-985    Notice of assumption of lead agency status.

197-11-990    Notice of action.

(Ord. 1853 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018).