Chapter 2.88 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY

A. The city of Sedro-Woolley adopts the ordinance codified in this chapter under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C.120, and the SEPA rules, WAC 197-11-904.

B. This chapter contains the city’s SEPA procedures and policies.

C. The SEPA rules, Chapter 197-11 WAC, must be used in conjunction with this chapter. (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

Article II. General Requirements

2.88.020 Purpose of this part and adoption by reference.

This part contains the basic requirements that apply to the SEPA process. This city adopts the following sections of Chapter 197-11 WAC by reference:

WAC

197-11-040 Definitions.

197-11-050 Lead agency.

197-11-060 Content of environmental review.

197-11-070 Limitations on actions during SEPA process.

197-11-080 Incomplete or unavailable information.

197-11-090 Supporting documents.

197-11-100 Information required of applicants.

197-11-158 GMA project review—Reliance on existing plans, laws, and regulations.

197-11-210 SEPA/GMA integration.

197-11-220 SEPA/GMA definitions.

197-11-228 Overall SEPA/GMA integration procedures.

197-11-230 Timing of an integrated SEPA/GMA process.

197-11-232 SEPA/GMA integration procedures for preliminary planning, environmental analysis, and expanded scoping.

197-11-235 Documents.

197-11-238 Monitoring.

197-11-250 SEPA/Model Toxics Control Act integration.

197-11-253 SEPA lead agency for MTCA actions.

197-11-256 Preliminary evaluation.

197-11-259 Determination of nonsignificance for MTCA remedial actions.

197-11-262 Determination of significance and EIS for MTCA remedial actions.

197-11-265 Early scoping for MTCA actions.

197-11-268 MTCA interim actions.

(Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.030 Additional definitions.

In addition to those definitions contained within WAC 197-11-700 through 197-11-799 and 197-11-220, when used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context indicates otherwise:

A. “SEPA rules” means Chapter 197-11 WAC adopted by the Department of Ecology.

B. “Early notice” means the city’s response to an applicant stating whether it considers issuance of a determination of significance likely for the applicant’s proposal (mitigated determination of nonsignificance (DNS) procedures).

C. “City department” means any division, subdivision or organizational unit of the city of Sedro-Woolley established by ordinance, rule or order.

D. “Ordinance” means any ordinance, resolution, or other procedure used by the city to adopt regulatory requirements. (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.040 Designation of responsible official.

A. For those proposals for which the city is the lead agency, the responsible official shall be the planning director or any other such person as the director may designate in writing.

B. For all proposals for which the city is the lead agency, the responsible official shall make the threshold determination, supervise scoping and preparation of any required environmental impact statement (EIS), and perform any other functions assigned to the “lead agency” or “responsible official” by those sections of the SEPA rules that were adopted by reference in SWMC 2.88.020.

C. The city shall retain all documents required by the SEPA rules (Chapter 197-11 WAC) and make them available in accordance with Chapter 42.17 RCW. (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.050 Lead agency determination and responsibilities.

WAC 173-806-050 Lead agency determination and responsibilities.

A. When receiving an application for or initiating a proposal that involves a nonexempt action, the city shall determine the lead agency for that proposal under WAC 197-11-050, 197-11-253, and 197-11-922 through 197-11-940.

B. When the city is the lead agency for a proposal, and if an EIS is necessary, the responsible official shall supervise preparation of the EIS.

C. When the city is not the lead agency for a proposal, the city shall use and consider, as appropriate, either the DNS or the final EIS of the lead agency in making decisions on the proposal. The city shall not prepare or require preparation of a DNS or EIS in addition to that prepared by the lead agency, unless required under WAC 197-11-600. In some cases, the city may conduct supplemental environmental review under WAC 197-11-600.

D. If the city receives a lead agency determination made by another agency that appears inconsistent with the criteria of WAC 197-11-253 or 197-11-922 through 197-11-940, it may object to the determination. Any objection must be made to the agency originally making the determination and resolved within fifteen days of receipt of the determination, or the city must petition the department of ecology for a lead agency determination under WAC 197-11-946 within the fifteen-day time period. Any such petition on behalf of the city may be initiated by the responsible official or their designee.

E. The responsible official is authorized to make agreements as to lead agency status or shared lead agency duties for a proposal under WAC 197-11-942 and 197-11-944.

F. If the city makes a lead agency determination for a private project, it shall require sufficient information from the applicant to identify which other agencies have jurisdiction over the proposal.

G. When the city is lead agency for a MTCA remedial action, the department of ecology shall be provided an opportunity under WAC 197-11-253(5) to review the environmental documents prior to public notice being provided. If the SEPA and MTCA documents are issued together with one public comment period under WAC 197-11-253(6), the city shall decide jointly with ecology who receives the comment letters and how copies of the comment letters will be distributed to the other agency. (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.058 Additional timing considerations.

For nonexempt proposals, the DNS, MDNS, or EIS for the proposal shall accompany the city’s staff recommendation to any appropriate advisory body, such as the planning commission. (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.060 Additional consideration in time limits applicable to the SEPA process.

Time estimates contained in this section (expressed in calendar days) shall apply when the city processes licenses for all private projects and those governmental proposals submitted to the city by other agencies. The actual time may vary with the complexity of the project, availability of staff, cooperation of agencies with jurisdiction or expertise, etc. The time estimates contained herein shall not be construed to be mandatory. Time periods for making threshold determinations shall commence upon payment of fees.

A. Categorical Exemptions. The city will normally identify whether an action is categorically exempt within seven days of receiving a completed application.

B. Threshold Determinations.

1. The city will normally complete threshold determinations that can be based solely upon review of the environmental checklist for the proposal within fifteen days of the date an applicant’s completed application and completed checklist are submitted.

2. When the responsible official requires further information from the applicant or consultation with other agencies with jurisdictions:

a. The city will normally request such further information within fifteen days of receiving a completed application and completed environmental checklist;

b. The city will normally wait no longer than thirty days for a consulted agency to respond;

c. The responsible official will normally complete the threshold determination within fifteen days of receiving the requested information from the applicant or the consulted agency.

3. When the city must initiate further studies, including field investigations, to obtain the information to make the threshold determination, the city will normally complete the studies within thirty days of receiving a completed application and a completed checklist.

4. The city will normally complete threshold determinations on actions where the applicant recommends in writing that an EIS be prepared, because of the probable significant adverse environmental impact(s) described in the application, within fifteen days of receiving a completed application and completed checklist. (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

Article III. Categorical Exemptions and Threshold Determinations

2.88.065 Purpose of this part and adoption by reference.

This part contains the rules for deciding whether a proposal has a “probable significant, adverse environmental impact” requiring an environmental impact statement (EIS) to be prepared. This part also contains rules for evaluating the impacts of proposals not requiring an EIS. The city adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented in this part:

WAC

197-11-300 Purpose of this part.

197-11-305 Categorical exemptions.

197-11-310 Threshold determination required.

197-11-315 Environmental checklist.

197-11-330 Threshold determination process.

197-11-335 Additional information.

197-11-340 Determination of nonsignificance (DNS).

197-11-350 Mitigated DNS.

197-11-355 Optional DNS process.

197-11-360 Determination of significance (DS)/initial scoping.

197-11-390 Effect of threshold determination.

197-11-800 Categorical exemptions.

197-11-880 Emergencies.

197-11-890 Petitioning DOE to change exemptions.

(Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.070 Flexible thresholds for categorical exemptions.

A. Categorical exemptions are adopted by reference under SWMC 2.88.180. The city establishes the following exempt levels for minor new construction under WAC 197-11-800(1)(b) based on local conditions:

1. For residential dwelling units in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i): four units;

2. For agriculture structures in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(ii): ten thousand square feet;

3. For office, school, commercial, recreational, service or storage buildings in WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(iii): four thousand square feet and twenty parking spaces;

4. For parking lots in WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(iv): twenty parking spaces;

5. For landfills and excavations in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(v): one hundred cubic yards;

B. The city shall send the new exempt levels established under this section to the Department of Ecology, Headquarters Office, Olympia, Washington, 98504, under WAC 197-11-800(1)(c). (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.080 Use of exemptions.

A. Upon receiving an application for a license or, in the case of governmental proposals, initiating the proposal, the city shall determine whether the license and/or the proposal is exempt. The city’s determination that a proposal is exempt shall be final and not subject to administrative review. If a proposal is exempt, none of the procedural requirements of this chapter shall apply to the proposal.

B. In determining whether or not a proposal is exempt, the city shall make certain the proposal is properly defined and shall identify the governmental licenses required. (WAC 197-11-060) If a proposal includes exempt and nonexempt actions, the city shall determine the lead agency, even if the license application that triggers the city’s consideration is exempt.

C. If a proposal includes both exempt and nonexempt actions, the city may authorize exempt actions prior to compliance with the procedural requirements of this chapter, except that:

1. The city shall not give authorization for:

a. Any nonexempt action;

b. Any action that would have an adverse environmental impact; or

c. Any action that would limit the choice of alternatives.

2. The city may withhold approval of an exempt action that would lead to modification of the physical environment, when such modification would serve no purpose if nonexempt action(s) were not approved.

D. Proposed short subdivision of land that is adjacent to previous short subdivisions or adjacent to land on which a subdivision is pending shall not be exempt if adjacent subdivisions share any improvements or access easements. In such cases, the proposed short plat will be considered physically or functionally related regardless of ownership. (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.090 Environmental checklist.

A. Except as provided in subsection (C) of this section, a completed environmental checklist (or a copy), in the form provided in WAC 197-11-960, shall be filed at the same time as an application for a permit, license, certificate, or other approval not specifically exempted in this chapter; provided, that a checklist is not needed if the city and applicant agree an EIS is required, SEPA compliance has been completed, or SEPA compliance has been initiated by another agency. The city shall use the environmental checklist to determine the lead agency.

B. For private proposals, the city will require the applicant to complete the environmental checklist, providing assistance as necessary. For city proposals, the applicant shall complete the environmental checklist for that proposal.

C. The city may require that it, and not the private applicant, will complete all or part of the environmental checklist for a private proposal, if either of the following occurs:

1. The city has technical information on a question or questions that is unavailable to the private applicant; or

2. The applicant has provided inaccurate information on previous proposals or on proposals currently under consideration.

D. For projects submitted as planned actions under WAC 197-11-164, the city shall use its existing environmental checklist form or may modify the environmental checklist form as provided in WAC 197-11-315. The modified environmental checklist form may be prepared and adopted along with or as part of a planned action ordinance; or developed after the ordinance is adopted. In either case, a proposed modified environmental checklist form must be sent to the Department of Ecology to allow at least a thirty-day review prior to use. (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.100 Mitigated DNS.

A. As provided in this section and in WAC 197-11-350, the responsible official may issue a DNS based on conditions attached to the proposal by the responsible official or on changes to, or clarifications of, the proposal made by the applicant.

B. An applicant may request in writing early notice of whether a DS is likely under WAC 197-11-350. The request must:

1. Follow submission of a permit application and environmental checklist for a nonexempt proposal for which the city is lead agency; and

2. Precede the city’s actual threshold determination for the proposal.

C. The responsible official should respond to the request for early notice within fifteen working days. The response shall:

1. Be written;

2. State whether the city currently considers issuance of a DS likely and, if so, indicate the general or specific areas of concern that are leading the city to consider a DS; and

3. State that the applicant may change or clarify the proposal to mitigate the indicated impacts, revising the environmental checklist and/or permit application as necessary to reflect the changes or clarifications.

D. As much as possible, the city should assist the applicant with identification of impacts to the extent necessary to formulate mitigation measures.

E. When the applicant submits a changed or clarified proposal along with a revised or amended environmental checklist, the city shall base its threshold determination on the changed or clarified proposal and should make the determination within fifteen days of receiving the changed or clarified proposal.

1. If the city indicated specific mitigation measures in its response in its response to the request for early notice, and the applicant changed or clarified the proposal to include those specific mitigation measures, the city shall issue and circulate a DNS under WAC 197-11-340(2).

2. If the city indicated areas of concern, but did not indicate specific mitigation measures that would allow it to issue a DNS, the city shall make the threshold determination, issuing a DNS or DS as appropriate.

3. The applicant’s proposed mitigation measures (clarifications, changes or conditions) must be in writing and must be specific. For example, proposals to “control noise” or “prevent stormwater runoff,” to “muffle machinery to X decibel” or “construct two hundred-foot stormwater retention pond at Y location” are adequate.

4. Mitigation measures which justify issuance of a mitigated DNS may be incorporated in the DNS by reference to agency staff reports, studies or other documents.

F. A mitigated DNS is issued either under WAC 197-11-340(2), requiring a fourteen-day comment period and public notice, or under WAC 197-11-335, which may require no additional comment period beyond the comment period on the notice of application.

G. Mitigation measures incorporated in the mitigated DNS shall be deemed conditions of approval of the permit decision and may be enforced in the same manner as any term or condition of the permit, or enforced in any manner specifically prescribed by the city. Failure to comply with the designated mitigation measures shall be grounds for suspension and/or revocation of any issued license or permit.

H. If the city’s tentative decision on a permit or approval does not include mitigation measures that were incorporated in a mitigated DNS for the proposal, the city should evaluate the threshold determination to assure consistency with WAC 197-11-340(3)(a) (Withdrawal of DNS).

I. The city’s written response under subsection (B) of this section shall not be construed as a determination of significance. In addition, preliminary discussions of clarifications or changes to a proposal, as opposed to a written request for early notice, shall not bind the city to consider the clarifications or changes in its threshold determination. (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

Article IV. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

2.88.110 Purpose of this part and adoption by reference.

This part contains the rules for preparing environmental impact statements. The city adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented by this part:

WAC

197-11-400 Purpose of EIS.

197-11-402 General requirements.

197-11-405 EIS types.

197-11-406 EIS timing.

197-11-408 Scoping.

197-11-410 Expanded scoping.

197-11-420 EIS preparation.

197-11-425 Style and size.

197-11-430 Format.

197-11-435 Cover letter or memo.

197-11-440 EIS contents.

197-11-442 Contents of EIS on nonproject proposals.

197-11-443 EIS contents when prior nonproject EIS.

197-11-444 Elements of the environment.

197-11-448 Relationship of EIS to other considerations.

197-11-450 Cost-benefit analysis.

197-11-455 Issuance of DEIS.

197-11-460 Issuance of FEIS.

(Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.120 Preparation of EIS—Additional considerations.

A. Preparation of draft and final EISs (DEIS and FEIS) and draft and final supplemental EIS’s (SEIS) is the responsibility of the city under the direction of the responsible official. Before the city issues an EIS, the responsible official shall be satisfied that it complies with this chapter and Chapter 197-11 WAC.

B. The DEIS and FEIS or draft and final SEIS shall be prepared by city staff, the applicant, or by a consultant selected by the city or the applicant. If the responsible official requires an EIS for a proposal and determines that someone other than the city will prepare the EIS, the responsible official shall notify the applicant immediately after completion of the threshold determination. The responsible official shall also notify the applicant of the city’s procedure for EIS preparation, including approval of the DEIS and FEIS prior to distribution.

C. The city may require an applicant to provide information the city does not possess, including specific investigations. However, the applicant is not required to supply information that is not required under this chapter or that is being requested from another agency. (This does not apply to information the city may request under another ordinance or statute.) (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.125 Additional elements to be covered in an EIS.

The following additional elements are part of the environment for the purpose of EIS content, but do not add to the criteria for threshold determinations or perform any other function or purpose under this chapter:

A. Economy of the area;

B. Social policy analysis;

C. Cost-benefit analysis;

D. Such other elements as may be required by the responsible official. (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

Article V. Commenting

2.88.128 Adoption by reference.

This part contains rules for consulting, commenting, and responding on all environmental documents under SEPA, including rules for public notice and hearings. The city adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented in this part:

WAC

197-11-500 Purpose of this part.

197-11-502 Inviting comment.

197-11-504 Availability and cost of environmental documents.

197-11-508 SEPA register.

197-11-510 Public notice.

197-11-535 Public hearings and meetings.

197-11-545 Effect of no comment.

197-11-550 Specificity of comments.

197-11-560 FEIS response to comments.

197-11-570 Consulted agency costs to assist lead agency.

(Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.132 Public notice.

A. Whenever possible, the city shall integrate the public notice required under this section with existing notice procedures for the city’s/county’s nonexempt permit(s) or approval(s) required for the proposal.

B. Whenever the city issues a DNS under WAC 197-11-340(2) or a DS under WAC 197-11-360(3) the city shall give public notice as follows:

1. If public notice is required for a nonexempt license, the notice shall state whether a DS or DNS has been issued and when comments are due.

2. If an environmental document is issued concurrently with the notice of application, the public notice requirements for the notice of application in RCW 36.70B.110(4) will suffice to meet the SEPA public notice requirements in WAC 197-11-510(1).

3. If no public notice is otherwise required for the permit or approval, the city/county shall give notice of the DNS or DS by:

a. Posting the property, for site-specific proposals;

b. Publishing notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the county, city, or general area where the proposal is located;

c. Notifying public or private groups which have expressed interest in a certain proposal or in the type of proposal being considered;

4. Whenever the city/county issues a DS under WAC 197-11-360(3), the city/county shall state the scoping procedure for the proposal in the DS as required in WAC 197-11-408 and in the public notice.

C. If a DNS is issued using the optional DNS process, the public notice requirements for a notice of application in RCW 36.70B.110(4) as supplemented by the requirements in WAC 197-11-355 will suffice to meet the SEPA public notice requirements in WAC 197-11-510(1)(b).

D. Whenever the city/county issues a DEIS under WAC 197-11-455(5) or a SEIS under WAC 197-11-620, notice of the availability of those documents shall be given by:

1. Indicating the availability of the DEIS in any public notice required for a nonexempt license; and

2. Posting the property, for site-specific proposals;

3. Publishing notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the county, city, or general area where the proposal is located;

4. Notifying public or private groups which have expressed interest in a certain proposal or in the type of proposal being considered;

E. Public notice for projects that qualify as planned actions shall be tied to the underlying permit as specified in WAC 197-11-172(3).

F. The city may require an applicant to complete the public notice requirements for the applicant’s proposal at his or her expense. (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.140 Designation of official to perform consulted agency responsibilities for the city.

A. The responsible official shall be responsible for preparation of written comments for the city in response to a consultation request prior to a threshold determination, participation in scoping, and reviewing a DEIS.

B. The responsible official shall be responsible for the city’s compliance with WAC 197-11-550 whenever the city is a consulted agency and is authorized to develop operating procedures that will ensure that responses to consultation requests are prepared in a timely fashion and include data from all appropriate city departments. (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

Article VI. Using Existing Environmental Documents

2.88.150 Purpose of this part and adoption by reference.

This part contains rules for using and supplementing existing environmental documents prepared under SEPA or National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for the city’s own environmental compliance. The city adopts the following sections by reference:

WAC

197-11-164 Planned actions—Definition and criteria.

197-11-168 Ordinances or resolutions designating planned actions—Procedures for adoption.

197-11-172 Planned actions—Project review.

197-11-600 When to use existing environmental documents.

197-11-610 Use of NEPA documents.

197-11-620 Supplemental environmental impact statement—Procedures.

197-11-625 Addenda—Procedures.

197-11-630 Adoption—Procedures.

197-11-635 Incorporation by reference—Procedures.

197-11-640 Combining documents.

(Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

Article VII. SEPA and Agency Decisions

2.88.155 Purpose of this part and adoption by reference.

This part contains rules (and policies) for SEPA’s substantive authority, such as decisions to mitigate or reject proposals as a result of SEPA. This part also contains procedures for appealing SEPA determinations to agencies or the courts. The city adopts the following sections by reference:

WAC

197-11-650 Purpose of this part.

197-11-655 Implementation.

197-11-660 Substantive authority and mitigation.

197-11-680 Appeals.

(Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.160 Substantive authority.

A. The policies and goals set forth in this chapter are supplementary to those in the existing authorization of the city of Sedro-Woolley.

B. The city may attach conditions to a permit or approval for a proposal so long as:

1. Such conditions are necessary to mitigate specific probable adverse environmental impacts identified in environmental documents prepared pursuant to this chapter; and

2. Such conditions are in writing; and

3. The conditions or mitigation measures included in such conditions are reasonable and capable of being accomplished; and

4. The city has considered whether other local, state, or federal mitigation measures applied to the proposal are sufficient to mitigate the identified impacts; and

5. Such conditions are based on one or more policies in subsection (D) of this section.

C. The city may deny a permit or approval for a proposal on the basis of SEPA so long as:

1. A finding is made that approving the proposal would result in probable significant adverse environmental impacts that are identified in a FEIS or final SEIS prepared pursuant to this chapter; and

2. A finding is made that no reasonable mitigation measures are capable of being accomplished that are sufficient to mitigate the identified impact; and

3. The denial is based on one or more policies identified in subsection (D) of this section and identified in writing in the decision document.

D. The city designates and adopts by reference the following policies as the basis for the city’s exercise of authority pursuant to this section:

1. The city shall use all practicable means, consistent with other essential considerations of state policy, to improve and coordinate plans, functions, programs, and resources to the end that the state and its citizens may:

a. Fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustee of the environment for succeeding generations;

b. Assure for all people of Washington safe, healthful, productive, and aesthetically and culturally pleasing surroundings;

c. Attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the environment without degradation, risk to health or safety, or other undesirable and unintended consequences;

d. Preserve important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our national heritage;

e. Maintain, wherever possible, an environment which supports diversity and variety of individual choice;

f. Achieve a balance between population and resource use which will permit high standards of living and a wide sharing of life’s amenities; and

g. Enhance the quality of renewable resources and approach the maximum attainable recycling of depletable resources.

2. The city recognizes that each person has a fundamental and inalienable right to a healthful environment and that each person has a responsibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the environment.

3. The city adopts by reference the policies in the following:

a. Sedro-Woolley Municipal Code, including all other chapters contained in Title 15, Buildings and Construction, as may be further amended;

b. Sedro-Woolley Comprehensive Plan, and map, as may be further amended;

c. Shoreline Management Act, as may be further amended;

d. Growth Management Act, as may be further amended;

e. Forest Practice Act and Regulations as may be further amended. (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.170 Appeals.

A. Any person may appeal the issuance of:

1. A determination of nonsignificance; and

2. A final environmental impact statement.

B. An appeal must be filed in writing with the responsible official within fourteen calendar days of the decision. The appeal shall identify the decision, contain a summary of the grounds for the appeal and be accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount established by resolution of the city council. Following the receipt of the appeal and fee, the responsible official shall transmit a copy of the appeal to the hearing examiner for an open record hearing pursuant to SWMC 2.90. Any party with standing may file an appeal of the decision of the hearing examiner’s decision with the superior court per the Land Use Petition Act RCW 36.70C.

C. Because a major purpose of this chapter is to combine environmental considerations with public decisions, any appeal brought under this chapter shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act provides a basis for challenging whether governmental action is in compliance with the substantive and procedural provisions of this chapter. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action.

D. Unless otherwise provided by this section:

1. Appeals under this chapter shall be of the governmental action together with its accompanying environmental determinations.

2. Appeals of environmental determination made (or lacking) under this chapter shall be commenced within the time required to appeal the governmental action which is subject to environmental review.

E. Only one appeal proceeding is allowed on a procedural determination (the adequacy of a determination of nonsignificance or of a final environmental impact statement). Such appeals shall also be allowed for a determination of nonsignificance which may be issued by the agency after supplemental review.

F. The appeal shall consolidate an appeal of procedural issues and of substantive determinations made under this chapter with a hearing or appeal on the underlying governmental action by providing for a single simultaneous hearing to consider the decisions on a proposal and any appealable environmental determinations made under this chapter as defined in subsection (A) of this section.

G. For any appeal under this subsection, the city shall provide for a record that shall consist of the following:

1. Findings and conclusions;

2. Testimony under oath; and

3. A taped or written transcript.

H. The city may require the appellant to provide an electronic transcript.

I. The procedural determination by the city’s responsible official shall carry substantial weight in any appeal proceeding.

J. If a person aggrieved by an agency action has the right to judicial appeal and if an agency has an appeal procedure, such person shall, prior to seeking any judicial review, use such agency procedure if any such procedure is available, unless expressly provided otherwise by state statute.

K. The procedures for Type III open record hearings and closed record appeals shall govern appeals from the decisions of the responsible official under this section, to the extent applicable.

L. The city shall give official notice under WAC 197-11-680(5) whenever it issues a permit or approval for which a statute or ordinance establishes a time limit for commencing judicial appeal.

M. The fees and charges for appeals and preparation of transcripts and records shall be paid by the appellant pursuant to the applicable ordinance or resolution. (Ord. 1607-08 § 2, 2008; Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.171 Planned action.

A. A planned action, as provided for in subsection (B) of this section, does not require a threshold determination or the preparation of an environmental impact statement under this chapter, but is subject to environmental review and mitigation as provided in this chapter.

B. 1. For purposes of this section, a planned action means one or more types of project action that:

a. Are designated planned actions by an ordinance or resolution adopted by a county, city or town planning under RCW 36.70A.040;

b. Have had the significant impacts adequately addressed in an environmental impact statement prepared in conjunction with (i) a comprehensive plan or subarea plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, or (ii) a phased project;

c. Are subsequent or implementing projects for the proposals listed in (1)(b) of this subsection;

d. Are located within an urban growth area, as defined in RCW 36.70A.030;

e. Are not essential public facilities, as defined in RCW 36.70A.200; and

f. Are consistent with the comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW.

2. A county, city, or town shall limit planned actions to certain types of development or to specific geographical areas that are less extensive than the jurisdictional boundaries of the county, city, or town and may limit a planned action to a time period identified in the environmental impact statement or the ordinance or resolution adopted under this subsection. (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

2.88.173 Notice/statute of limitations.

A. The city, applicant for, or proponent of an action may publish a notice of action pursuant to RCW 43.21C.080 for any action.

B. The form of the notice shall be substantially in the form provided in WAC 197-11-990. The notice shall be published by the city clerk or county auditor, applicant or proponent pursuant to RCW 43.21C.080. (Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

Article VIII. Definitions

2.88.175 Purpose of this part and adoption by reference.

This part contains uniform usage and definitions of terms under SEPA. The city adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented by SWMC 2.88.040:

WAC

197-11-700 Definitions.

197-11-702 Act.

197-11-704 Action.

197-11-706 Addendum.

197-11-708 Adoption.

197-11-710 Affected tribe.

197-11-712 Affecting.

197-11-714 Agency.

197-11-716 Applicant.

197-11-718 Built environment.

197-11-720 Categorical exemption.

197-11-721 Closed record appeal.

197-11-722 Consolidated appeal.

197-11-724 Consulted agency.

197-11-726 Cost-benefit analysis.

197-11-728 County/city.

197-11-730 Decision maker.

197-11-732 Department.

197-11-734 Determination of nonsignificance (DNS).

197-11-736 Determination of significance (DS).

197-11-738 EIS.

197-11-740 Environment.

197-11-742 Environmental checklist.

197-11-744 Environmental document.

197-11-746 Environmental review.

197-11-750 Expanded scoping.

197-11-752 Impacts.

197-11-754 Incorporation by reference.

197-11-756 Lands covered by water.

197-11-758 Lead agency.

197-11-760 License.

197-11-762 Local agency.

197-11-764 Major action.

197-11-766 Mitigated DNS.

197-11-768 Mitigation.

197-11-770 Natural environment.

197-11-772 NEPA.

197-11-774 Non-project.

197-11-775 Open record hearing.

197-11-776 Phased review.

197-11-778 Preparation.

197-11-780 Private project.

197-11-782 Probable.

197-11-784 Proposal.

197-11-786 Reasonable.

197-11-788 Responsible official.

197-11-790 SEPA.

197-11-792 Scope.

197-11-793 Scoping.

197-11-794 Significant.

197-11-796 State agency.

197-11-797 Threshold determination.

197-11-799 Underlying governmental action.

(Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

Article IX. Agency Compliance

2.88.185 Purpose of this part and adoption by reference.

This part contains rules for agency compliance with SEPA, including rules for charging fees under the SEPA process, designating categorical exemptions which do not apply within critical areas, listing agencies with environmental expertise, selecting the lead agency, and applying these rules to current agency activities. The city adopts the following sections by reference:

WAC

197-11-900 Purpose of this part.

197-11-902 Agency SEPA policies.

197-11-916 Application to ongoing actions.

197-11-920 Agencies with environmental expertise.

197-11-922 Lead agency rules.

197-11-924 Determining the lead agency.

197-11-926 Lead agency for governmental proposals.

197-11-928 Lead agency for public and private proposals.

197-11-930 Lead agency for private projects with one agency with jurisdiction.

197-11-932 Lead agency for private projects requiring licensing from more than one agency, when one of the agencies is county/city.

197-11-934 Lead agency for private projects requiring licenses from a local agency, not a county/city, and one or more state agencies.

197-11-936 Lead agency for private projects requiring licenses from more than one state agency.

197-11-938 Lead agencies for specific proposals.

197-11-940 Transfer of lead agency status.

197-11-942 Agreements on lead agency status.

197-11-944 Agreements on division of lead agency duties.

197-11-946 DOE resolution of lead agency disputes.

197-11-948 Assumption of lead agency status.

(Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)

Article X. Forms

2.88.205 Adoption by reference.

The city adopts the following forms and sections by reference.

WAC

197-11-960 Environmental checklist.

197-11-965 Adoption notice.

197-11-970 Determination of non-significance (DNS).

197-11-980 Determination of significance and scoping notice (DS).

197-11-985 Notice of assumption of lead agency status.

197-11-990 Notice of action.

(Ord. 1448-03 § 2 (part), 2003)