Chapter 15.08 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY

Sections 15.08.020 through 15.08.055, inclusive, contain the basic requirements that apply to the SEPA process. The city adopts the following sections of Chapter 197-11 of the Washington Administrative Code by reference:

WAC

197-11-040 Definitions.

197-11-050 Lead agency.

197-11-055 Timing of the SEPA process.

197-11-060 Content of environmental review.

197-11-070 Limitations on actions during SEPA process.

197-11-080 Incomplete or unavailable information.

197-11-090 Supporting documents.

197-11-100 Information required of applicants.

(Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.030 Additional definitions.

In addition to those definitions contained within WAC 197-11-700 through 197-11-799, when used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context indicates otherwise:

“Department” means any division, subdivision or organizational unit of the city established by ordinance, rule, or order.

“Early notice” means the city’s response to an applicant stating whether it considers issuance of a determination of significance likely for the applicant’s proposal (mitigated determination of nonsignificance (DNS) procedures).

“Ordinance” means the ordinance, resolution or other procedure used by the city to adopt regulatory requirements.

“SEPA rules” means Chapter 197-11 WAC adopted by the Washington Department of Ecology. (Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.040 Designation of responsible official.

(a) For those proposals for which the city is the lead agency, the responsible official shall be the mayor.

(b) For all proposals for which the city is the lead agency, the mayor shall make the threshold determination, supervise scoping and preparation of any required environmental impact statement (EIS), and perform any other functions assigned to the lead agency or mayor by those sections of the SEPA rules that were adopted by reference in WAC 173-806-020.

(c) The city shall retain all documents required by the SEPA rules (Chapter 197-11 WAC) and make them available in accordance with RCW Chapter 42.17. (Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.050 Lead agency determination and responsibilities.

(a) Upon receipt of an application for or initiating a proposal that involves a nonexempt action, the city shall determine the lead agency for that proposal under WAC 197-11-050 and WAC 197-11-922 through 197-11-940, unless the lead agency has been previously determined or the department is aware that another department or agency is in the process of determining the lead agency.

(b) When the city is not the lead agency for a proposal, the city shall use and consider, as appropriate, either the DNS or the final EIS of the lead agency in making decisions on the proposal. No DNS or EIS in addition to that prepared by the lead agency, unless required under WAC 197-11-600, shall be prepared or required. In some cases, the city may conduct supplemental environmental review under WAC 197-11-600.

(c) If the city receives a lead agency determination made by another agency that appears inconsistent with the criteria of WAC 197-11-922 through 197-11-940, it may object to the determination. Any objection must be made to the agency originally making the determination and resolved within fifteen days of receipt of the determination, or the city must petition the Washington Department of Ecology for a lead agency determination under WAC 197-11-946 within the fifteen-day time period. Any such petition on behalf of the city may be initiated by the mayor.

(d) Private project applicants shall supply sufficient information to identify which other agencies have jurisdiction over the proposal. (Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.053 Transfer of lead agency status to a state agency.

For any proposal for a private project where the city would be the lead agency and for which one or more state agencies have jurisdiction, the mayor may elect to transfer the lead agency duties to a state agency. The state agency with jurisdiction appearing first on the priority listing in WAC 197-11-936 shall be the lead agency and the city shall be an agency with jurisdiction. To transfer lead agency duties, the mayor must transmit a notice of the transfer together with any relevant information available on the proposal to the appropriate state agency with jurisdiction, the private applicant, and any other agencies with jurisdiction over the proposal. (Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.055 Considerations in SEPA process timing.

The following time limits (expressed in calendar days) shall apply when the city processes licenses for all private projects and those governmental proposals submitted to the city by other agencies:

(1) Categorical Exemptions. The city shall identify whether an action is categorically exempt from SEPA no later than fourteen days after issuing a determination of completeness as provided under Section 20.08.090 of this code.

(2) Threshold Determinations.

(A) Consistent with the requirements of Chapter 20.08 SMC, the city shall make threshold determinations:

(i) On or after the date of the close of the public comment period established in Section 20.08.100(E)(5); and

(ii) At least fifteen days or more prior to the public hearing on the permit.

(B) When the mayor requires information from other agencies with jurisdiction:

(i) The city should request such information on or before the date of the notice of application under Section 20.08. 100 of this code, and the comment period associated with the notice of application should be the largest period allowable under Section 20.08.100(E)(5);

(ii) The city will wait no longer than the expiration of the comment period for a consulted agency to respond.

(C) The city may complete threshold determinations on actions where the applicant recommends in writing that an EIS be prepared, because of the probable significant adverse environmental impact(s) described in the application, within fifteen days of issuing a determination of completeness under Section 20.08.090 of this code. (Ord. 1176 § 5, 1996; Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.110 EIS requirement-Sections adopted by reference.

Sections 15.08.110 through 15.08.150, inclusive, contain the rules for deciding whether a proposal has a “probable significant, adverse environmental impact” requiring an environmental impact statement (EIS) to be prepared. Said sections also contain rules for evaluating the impacts of proposals not requiring an EIS. The city adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented in this part:

WAC

197-11-300 Purpose of this part.

197-11-305 Categorical exemptions.

197-11-310 Threshold determination required.

197-11-315 Environmental checklist.

197-11-330 Threshold determination process.

197-11-335 Additional information.

197-11-340 Determination of nonsignificance (DNS).

197-11-350 Mitigated DNS.

197-11-360 Determination of significance (DS)/initiation of scoping.

197-11-390 Effect of threshold determination.

(Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.120 Thresholds for categorical exemptions.

(a) The city establishes the following exempt levels for minor new construction under WAC 197-11-800(1) (b) based on local conditions:

(1) For residential dwelling units in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i): up to one dwelling unit;

(2) For agricultural structures in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(ii): not applicable;

(3) For office, school, commercial, recreations, service or storage buildings in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(iii): up to four thousand square feet and up to twenty parking spaces;

(4) For parking lots in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(iv): up to twenty parking spaces;

(5) For landfills and excavations in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(v): up to five hundred cubic yards.

(b) Whenever the city establishes new exempt levels under this section, the clerk-treasurer shall send them to the Department of Ecology, Headquarters Office, Olympia, Washington, 98504 under WAC 197-11-800(1)(c). (Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.130 Use of exemptions.

(a) The mayor’s determination that a proposal is exempt shall be final and not subject to administrative review. If a proposal is exempt, none of the procedural requirements of this chapter apply to the proposal. The city shall not require completion of an environmental checklist for an exempt proposal.

(b) In determining whether or not a proposal is exempt, the mayor shall make certain the proposal is properly defined and shall identify the governmental licenses required (WAC 197-11-060). If a proposal includes exempt and nonexempt actions, the mayor shall determine the lead agency, even if the license application that triggers consideration is exempt.

(c) If a proposal includes both exempt and nonexempt actions, the city may authorize exempt actions prior to compliance with the procedural requirements of this chapter, except that:

(1) The city shall not give authorization for:

(A) Any nonexempt action;

(B) Any action that would have an adverse environmental impact; or

(2) The mayor may withhold approval of an exempt action that would lead to modification of the physical environment, when such modification would serve no purpose if nonexempt action(s) were not approved; and

(3) The mayor may withhold approval of exempt actions that would lead to substantial financial expenditures by a private applicant when the expenditures would serve no purpose if nonexempt action(s) were not approved. (Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.140 Environmental checklist.

(a) A completed environmental checklist (or a copy), in the form provided in WAC 197-11-960, shall be filed at the same time as an application for a permit, license, certificate or other approval not specifically exempted in this chapter; except, a checklist is not needed if the city and applicant agree an EIS is required, SEPA compliance has been completed, or SEPA compliance has been initiated by another agency. The city shall use the environmental checklist to determine the lead agency and, if the city is the lead agency, for making the threshold determination.

(b) For private proposals, the city will require the applicant to complete the environmental checklist. (Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.150 Mitigated DNS.

(a) As provided in this section and in WAC 197-11-350, the mayor may issue a DNS based on conditions attached to the proposal by the mayor or on changes to, or clarifications of, the proposal made by the applicant.

(b) An applicant may request in writing early notice of whether a DS is likely under WAC 197-11-350. The request must:

(1) Follow submission of a permit application and environmental checklist for a nonexempt proposal for which the city is lead agency; and

(2) Precede the city’s actual threshold determination for the proposal.

(c) The mayor should respond to the request for early notice within seven working days of receipt of the request, or of close of the comment period under Section 20.08.100 of this code, whichever is later. The response shall:

(1) Be written;

(2) State whether the city currently considers issuance of DS likely and, if so, indicate the general or specific area(s) of concern that is/are leading the city to consider a DS; and

(3) State that the applicant may change or clarify the proposal to mitigate the indicated impacts, revising the environmental checklist and/or permit application as necessary to reflect the changes or clarifications.

(d) When an applicant submits a changed or clarified proposal, along with a revised or amended environmental checklist, the city shall base its threshold determination on the changed or clarified proposal and should make the determination within fifteen days of receiving the changed or clarified proposal:

(1) If the city indicated specific mitigation measures in its response to the request for early notice, and the applicant changed or clarified the proposal to include those specific mitigation measures, the city may issue and circulate a DNS under WAC 197-11-340(2);

(2) If the city indicated areas of concern, but did not indicate specific mitigation measures that would allow it to issue a DNS, the city shall make the threshold determination, issuing a DNS or DS as appropriate;

(3) The applicant’s proposed mitigation measures (clarifications, changes or conditions) must be in writing and must be specific. For example, proposals to “control noise” or “prevent stormwater runoff’ are inadequate, whereas proposals to “muffle machinery to X decibel” or “construct two hundred-foot stormwater retention pond at Y location” are adequate;

(4) Mitigation measures which justify issuance of a mitigated DNS may be incorporated in the DNS by reference to reports, studies or other documents.

(e) A mitigated DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2), requiring a fifteen-day comment period and public notice.

(f) Mitigation measures incorporated in the mitigated DNS shall be deemed conditions of approval of the permit decision and may be enforced in the same manner as any term or condition of the permit, or enforced in any manner specifically prescribed by the city.

(g) If the city’s tentative decision on a permit or approval does not include mitigation measures that were incorporated in a mitigated DNS for the proposal, the city should evaluate the threshold determination to assure consistency with WAC 197-11-340(3)(a) (Withdrawal of DNS).

(h) The city’s written response under subsection (b) of this section shall not be construed as a determination of significance. In addition, preliminary discussion of clarifications or changes to a proposal, as opposed to a written request for early notice, shall not bind the city to consider the clarifications or changes in its threshold determination. (Ord. 1176 § 6, 1996; Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.210 Preparation of EIS-Adoption of certain sections by reference.

Sections 2.65.210 through 2.65.220, inclusive, contain the rules for preparing environmental impact statements.

The city adopts the following sections by reference:

WAC

197-11-400 Purpose of EIS.

197-11-402 General requirements.

197-11-405 EIS types.

197-11-406 EIS timing.

197-11-408 Scoping.

197-11-410 Expanded scoping. (Optional)

197-11-420 EIS preparation.

197-11-425 Style and size.

197-11-430 Format.

197-11-435 Cover letter or memo.

197-11-440 EIS contents.

197-11-442 Contents of EIS on nonproject proposals.

197-11-443 EIS contents when prior nonproject EIS.

197-11-444 Elements of the environment.

197-11-448 Relationship of EIS to other considerations.

197-11-450 Cost-benefit analysis.

197-11-455 Issuance of DEIS.

197-11-460 Issuance of FEIS.

(Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.220 Preparation of EIS-Additional considerations.

(a) Preparation of draft and final EIS’s (DEIS and FEIS) and draft and final supplemental EIS’s (SEIS) is the responsibility of the mayor. Before the city issues an EIS, the mayor shall be satisfied that it complies with this chapter and WAC Chapter 197-11.

(b) The DEIS and FEIS or draft and final SEIS shall be prepared by city staff, the applicant, or by a consultant selected by the city or the applicant. If the mayor requires an EIS for a proposal and determines that someone other than the city will prepare the EIS, the mayor shall notify the applicant immediately after completion of the thresh old determination. The mayor shall also notify that applicant of the city’s procedure for EIS preparation, including approval of the DEIS and FEIS prior to distribution.

(c) The city may require an applicant to provide information the city does not possess, including specific investigations. However, the applicant is not required to supply information that is not required under this chapter or that is being requested from another agency. (This does not apply to information the city may request under another ordinance or statute.)

(d) A project permit application shall lapse if a draft EIS is not submitted within nine months of the date of issuance of a determination of significance, unless the applicant and the city agree to a longer period in writing. (Ord. 1176 § 7, 1996; Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.310 Rules for consulting, commenting and responding-Adoption by reference.

Sections 15.08.310 through 15.08.330, inclusive, contain rules for consulting, commenting, and responding on all environmental documents under SEPA, including rules for public notice and hearings. The city adopts the following sections by reference:

WAC

197-11-500 Purpose of this part.

197-11-502 Inviting comment.

197-11-504 Availability and cost of environmental documents.

197-11-508 SEPA register.

197-11-535 Public hearings and meetings.

197-11-545 Effect of no comment.

197-11-550 Specificity of comments.

197-11-560 FEIS response to comments.

197-11-570 Consulted agency costs to assist lead agency.

(Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.320 Public notice.

(a) Whenever the city issues a DNS under WAC 197-11-340(2) or a DS under WAC 197-11-360(3), the city shall give public notice as follows:

(1) If public notice is required for a nonexempt license, the notice shall state whether a DS or DNS has been issued and when comments are due;

(2) If no public notice is required for the permit or approval, the city shall give notice of the DNS or DS by:

(A) Publishing notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the county, city or general area where the proposal is located;

(B) Notifying public or private groups which have requested such notice in writing regarding a certain proposal or type of proposal being considered;

(3) Whenever the city issues a DS under WAC 197-11-360(3), the city shall state the scoping procedure for the proposal in the DS as required in WAC 197-11-408 and in the public notice.

(b) Whenever the city issues a DEIS under WAC 197-11-455(5) or a SEIS under WAC 197-11-620, notice of the availability of those documents shall be given by:

(1) Indicating the availability of the DEIS in any public notice required for a nonexempt license; and

(2) Posting, publishing, etc., in the manner required for a DS or DNS.

(c) Whenever possible, the city shall integrate the public notice required under this section with existing notice procedures for the city’s nonexempt permit(s) or approval(s) required for the proposal.

(d) The city may require an applicant to complete the public notice requirements for the applicant’s proposal at his or her expense. (Ord. 1176 § 8, 1996; Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.330 Consulted agency official.

(a) The mayor shall be responsible for preparation of written comments for the city in response to a consultation request prior to a threshold determination, participation in scoping, and reviewing a DEIS.

(b) The mayor shall be responsible for the city’s compliance with WAC 197-11-550 whenever the city is a consulted agency, and is authorized to develop operating procedures that will ensure that responses to consultation requests are prepared in a timely fashion and include data from all appropriate departments of the city. (Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.410 Rules for using and supplementing existing environmental documents Adoption by reference.

This section contains rules for using and supplementing existing environmental documents prepared under SEPA or National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for the city’s own environmental compliance. The city adopts the following sections by reference:

WAC

197-11-600 When to use existing environmental documents.

197-11-610 Use of NEPA documents.

197-11-620 Supplemental environmental impact statement-Procedures.

197-11-625 Addenda-Procedures.

197-11-630 Adoption-Procedures.

197-11-635 Incorporation by reference—Procedures.

197-11-640 Combining documents.

(Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.510 Substantive authority and appeals Adoption by reference.

Sections 15.08.510 through 15.08.530, inclusive, contain rules (and policies) for SEPA’s substantive authority, such as decisions to mitigate or reject proposals as a result of SEPA. This part also contains procedures for appealing SEPA determinations to agencies or the courts. The city adopts the following sections by reference:

WAC

197-11-650 Purpose of this part.

197-11-655 Implementation.

197-11-660 Substantive authority and mitigation.

197-11-680 Appeals.

(Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.520 Permit issuance conditions Substantive authority.

(a) The policies and goals set forth in this chapter are supplementary to those in the existing authorization of the city.

(b) The city may attach conditions to a permit or approval for a proposal so long as:

(1) Such conditions are necessary to mitigate specific probable environmental impacts identified in environmental documents prepared pursuant to this chapter; and

(2) Such conditions are in writing; and

(3) The mitigation measures included in such conditions are reasonable and capable of being accomplished; and

(4) The city has considered whether other local, state or federal mitigation measures applied to the proposal are sufficient to mitigate the identified impacts; and

(5) Such conditions are based on one or more policies in subsection (d) of this section and cited in the license or other decision document.

(1) A finding is made that approving the proposal would result in probable significant adverse environmental impacts that are identified in a FEIS or final SEIS prepared pursuant to this chapter; and

(2) A finding is made that there are no reasonable mitigation measures capable of being accomplished that are sufficient to mitigate the identified impact; and

(3) The denial is based on one or more policies identified in subsection (d) of this section and identified in writing in the decision document.

(d) The city designates and adopts by reference the following policies as the basis for the city’s exercise of authority pursuant to this section:

(1) The city shall use all practicable means, consistent with other essential considerations of state policy, to improve and coordinate plans, function, programs and resources to the end that the state and its citizens may:

(A) Fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustee of the environment for succeeding generations;

(B) Assure for all people of Washington safe, healthful, productive, and aesthetically and culturally pleasing surroundings;

(C) Attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the environment without degradation, risk to health or safety, or other undesirable and unintended consequences;

(D) Preserve important historic, cultural and natural aspects of our national heritage.

(E) Maintain, wherever possible, an environment which supports diversity and variety of individual choice;

(F) Achieve a balance between population and re source use which will permit high standards of living and a wide sharing of life’s amenities; and

(G) Enhance the quality of renewable resources and approach the maximum attainable recycling of depletable resources.

(2) The city recognizes that each person has a fundamental and inalienable right to a healthful environment and that each person has a responsibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the environment.

(3) Policies established in:

(A) The city of Sumas comprehensive plan;

(B) Chapter 15.04, entitled Shoreline Management Program;

(D) Chapter 15.16, entitled Protection of Wetlands.

(e) When any proposal or action not requiring a decision of the city council is conditioned or denied on the basis of SEPA by a nonelected official, the decision shall be appealable in accordance with the provisions of Section 20.08.150. (Ord. 1176 §§ 9, 10, 1996; Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.530 Notice-Statute of limitation.

(a) The city, applicant for, or proponent of an action may publish a notice of action pursuant to RCW 42.21C.080 for any action.

(b) The form of the notice shall be substantially in the form provided in WAC 197-11-990. The notice shall be published by the clerk-treasurer or county auditor, applicant or proponent pursuant to RCW 43.21C.080. (Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.610 Definitions-Adoption by reference.

This section contains uniform usage and definitions of terms under SEPA. The city adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented by WAC 173-806-040:

WAC

197-11-700 Definitions.

197-11-702 Act.

197-11-704 Action.

197-11-706 Addendum.

197-11-708 Adoption.

197-11-710 Affected tribe.

197-11-712 Affecting.

197-11-714 Agency.

197-11-716 Applicant.

197-11-718 Built environment.

197-11-720 Categorical exemption.

197-11-722 Consolidated appeal.

197-11-724 Consulted agency.

197-11-726 Cost-benefit analysis.

197-11-728 County/city.

197-11-730 Decision maker.

197-11-732 Department.

197-11-734 Determination of nonsignificance (DNS).

197-11-736 Determination of significance (DS).

197-11-738 EIS.

197-11-740 Environment.

197-11-742 Environmental checklist.

197-11-744 Environmental document.

197-11-746 Environmental review.

197-11-748 Environmentally sensitive area.

197-11-750 Expanded scoping.

197-11-752 Impacts.

197-11-754 Incorporation by reference.

197-11-756 Lands covered by water.

197-11-758 Lead agency.

197-11-760 License.

197-11-762 Local agency.

197-11-764 Major action.

197-11-766 Mitigated DNS.

197-11-768 Mitigation.

197-11-770 Natural environment.

197-11-772 NEPA.

197-11-774 Nonproject.

197-11-776 Phased review.

197-11-778 Preparation.

197-11-780 Private project.

197-11-782 Probable.

197-11-784 Proposal.

197-11-786 Reasonable alternative.

197-11-788 Responsible official.

197-11-790 SEPA.

197-11-792 Scope.

197-11-793 Scoping.

197-11-794 Significant.

197-11-796 State agency.

197-11-797 Threshold determination.

197-11-799 Underlying governmental action.

(Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.710 Categorical exemptions-Adoption by reference.

The city adopts by reference the following rules for categorical exemptions, as supplemented in this chapter, including WAC 173-806-070 (Thresholds), WAC 173-806-080 (Use of exemptions), and WAC 173-806-190 (Environmentally sensitive areas):

WAC

197-11-800 Categorical exemptions.

197-11-880 Emergencies.

197-11-890 Petitioning DOE to change exemptions.

(Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.810 Agency compliance-Adoption by reference.

Sections 2.65.810 through 2.65.820, inclusive, contain rules for agency compliance with SEPA, including rules for charging fees under the SEPA process, designating environmentally sensitive areas, listing agencies with environmental expertise, selecting the lead agency, and applying these rules to current agency activities. The city adopts the following WAC sections:

WAC

197-11-900 Purpose of this part.

197-11-902 Agency SEPA policies.

197-11-916 Application to ongoing actions.

197-11-920 Agencies with environmental expertise.

197-11-922 Lead agency rules.

197-11-924 Determining the lead agency.

197-11-926 Lead agency for governmental proposals.

197-11-928 Lead agency for public and private proposals.

197-11-930 Lead agency for private projects with one agency with jurisdiction.

197-11-932 Lead agency for private projects requiring licenses from more than one agency, when one of the agencies is a county/city.

197-11-934 Lead agency for private projects requiring licenses from a local agency, not a county/city, and one or more state agencies.

197-11-936 Lead agency for private projects requiring licenses from more than one state agency.

197-11-938 Lead agencies for specific proposals.

197-11-940 Transfer of lead agency status to a state agency.

197-11-942 Agreements on lead agency status.

197-11-944 Agreement on division of lead agency duties.

197-11-946 DOE resolution of lead agency disputes.

197-11-948 Assumption of lead agency status.

(Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.820 Fees.

The city shall require the following fees for its activities in accordance with the provisions of this chapter:

(1) Threshold Determination. For every environmental checklist the city will review when it is lead agency, the city shall collect a fee as established in Chapter 20.108 from the proponent of the proposal prior to undertaking the threshold determination. The time periods provided by this chapter for making a threshold determination shall not begin to run until payment of the fee.

(2) Environmental Impact Statement.

(A) When the city is the lead agency for a proposal requiring an EIS and the mayor determines that the EIS shall be prepared by employees of the city, the city may charge and collect a reasonable fee from any applicant to cover costs incurred by the city in preparing the EIS. The mayor shall advise the applicant(s) of the projected costs for the EIS prior to actual preparation; the applicant shall post bond or otherwise ensure payment of such costs.

(B) The mayor may determine that the city will contract directly with a consultant for preparation of an EIS, or a portion of the EIS, for activities initiated by some persons or entity other than the city, and may bill such costs and expenses directly to the applicant. The city may require the applicant to post bond or otherwise ensure payment of such costs. Such consultants shall be selected by mutual agreement of the city and applicant after a call for proposals.

(C) If a proposal is modified so that an EIS is no longer required, the mayor shall refund any fees collected under subsection (2)(A) or (B) of this section which shall remain after incurred costs are paid.

(3) The city may collect a reasonable fee from an applicant to cover the cost of meeting the public notice requirements of this chapter relating to the applicant’s proposal.

(4) The city shall not collect a fee for performing its duties as a consulted agency.

(5) The city may charge any person for copies of any document prepared under this chapter, and for mailing the document, in a manner provided by Chapter 42.17 RCW. (Ord. 1176 § 66, 1996; Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.910 Forms—Adoption by reference.

The city adopts the following forms and sections by reference:

WAC

197-11-960 Environmental checklist.

197-11-965 Adoption notice.

197-11-970 Determination of nonsignificance (DNS).

197-11-980 Determination of significance and scoping notice (DS).

197-11-985 Notice of assumption of lead agency status.

197-11-990 Notice of action.

(Ord. 887 § 2 (part), 1984)

15.08.920 Copies of adopted statutes on file.

Pursuant to RCW 43.21C.135, the city clerk-treasurer is directed to maintain on file for public use and review at least three copies of the full text of the material adopted by reference in this chapter. (Ord. 887 § 3, 1984)