ARTICLE A. WETLANDS

SECTION:

10-5A-1:    Designation

10-5A-2:    Rating

10-5A-3:    Regulated Activities

10-5A-4:    Contents Of Critical Area Reports

10-5A-5:    Buffers

10-5A-6:    Compensatory Mitigation Requirements

10-5A-1 DESIGNATION:

Wetlands are those areas, designated in accordance with the approved federal wetland delineation manual and applicable regional supplements, that are inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street, or highway. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland areas created to mitigate conversion of wetlands. RCC Title 12, Appendix 1 Figures 1a and 1b (Proposed SMP Boundary Minimum Jurisdiction) identify the approximate location and extent of wetlands in Roy. Identification of wetlands and delineation of their boundaries, however, shall be determined in accordance with the approved federal wetland delineation manual and applicable regional supplements. All areas within the city meeting the wetland designation criteria in that procedure are hereby designated critical areas and subject to the provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 695, 11-22-2004; Ord. 938, 5-23-2016)

10-5A-2 RATING:

A.    Wetlands shall be rated category I, II, III, or IV according to the "Washington State Wetland Rating System For Western Washington – 2014 Update" (Ecology Publication 04-06-029, October 2014) or as revised by Ecology. Wetland categories shall apply to the wetland as it exists on the date the city adopts the rating system, as the wetland naturally changes thereafter, or as the wetland changes in accordance with permitted activities. Wetland rating categories shall not change due to illegal modifications.

B.    Wetland Rating Categories:

1. Category I: Category I wetlands are: (a) wetlands that are identified by scientists of the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as high quality wetland; (b) bogs; (c) mature and old growth forested wetlands larger than one acre; and (d) wetlands that perform many functions well (scoring between twenty-three (23) and twenty-seven (27) points). These wetlands are those that: (a) represent unique or rare wetland types; or (b) are more sensitive to disturbance than most wetlands; or (c) are relatively undisturbed and contain ecological attributes that are impossible to replace within a human lifetime; or (d) provide a high level of functions.

2. Category II: Category II wetlands are: wetlands with a moderately high level of functions (scoring between twenty (20) and twenty-two (22) points).

3. Category III: Category III wetlands are those wetlands with a moderate level of functions (scoring between sixteen (16) and nineteen (19)). Wetlands scoring between sixteen (16) and nineteen (19) points generally have been disturbed in some ways, and are often less diverse or more isolated from other natural resources in the landscape than Category II wetlands.

4. Category IV: Category IV wetlands are those wetlands with the lowest levels of functions (between nine (9) and fifteen (15) points) and are often heavily disturbed. These are wetlands that are possible to replace, and in some cases improve. However, experience has shown that replacement cannot be guaranteed in any specific case. These wetlands may provide some important functions, and should be protected to some degree. (Ord. 695, 11-22-2004; Ord. 938, 5-23-2016)

10-5A-3 REGULATED ACTIVITIES:

A.    For any regulated activity, a critical areas report (see chapter 5 of this title) may be required to support the requested activity.

B.    The following activities are regulated if they occur in a regulated wetland or its buffer:

1. The removal, excavation, grading, or dredging of soil, sand, gravel, minerals, organic matter, or material of any kind.

2. The dumping of, discharging of, or filling with any material.

3. The draining, flooding, or disturbing of the water level or water table.

4. Pile driving.

5. The placing of obstructions.

6. The construction, reconstruction, demolition, or expansion of any structure.

7. The destruction or alteration of wetland vegetation through clearing, harvesting, shading, intentional burning, or planting of vegetation that would alter the character of a regulated wetland.

8. "Class IV – General Forest Practices" under the authority of the "1992 Washington State Forest Practices Act Rules and Regulations," WAC 222-12-030, or as thereafter amended.

9. Activities that result in:

a. A significant change of water temperature.

b. A significant change of physical or chemical characteristics of the sources of water to the wetland.

c. A significant change in the quantity, timing, or duration of the water entering the wetland.

d. The introduction of pollutants.

C.    Subdivisions: The subdivision and/or short subdivision of land in wetlands and associated buffers are subject to the following:

1. Land that is located wholly within a wetland or its buffer may not be subdivided.

2. Land that is located partially within a wetland or its buffer may be subdivided; provided, that an accessible and contiguous portion of each new lot is:

a. Located outside of the wetland and its buffer; and

b. Meets the applicable minimum lot size requirements of Title 11. (Ord. 938, 5-23-2016)

10-5A-4 CONTENTS OF CRITICAL AREA REPORTS:

In addition to the general critical area report requirements of section 10-5-9, critical area reports for wetlands must meet the requirements of this section. Critical area reports for two (2) or more types of critical areas must meet the report requirements for each relevant type of critical area.

A.    Preparation By A Qualified Professional: A critical area report for wetlands shall be prepared by a qualified professional who is a certified professional wetland scientist or a noncertified professional wetland scientist with a minimum of five (5) years’ experience in the field of wetland science and with experience preparing wetland reports.

B.    Areas Addressed In Critical Area Report: The following areas shall be addressed in a critical area report for wetlands:

1. The project area of the proposed activity;

2. All wetlands and recommended buffers within three hundred feet (300') of the project area; and

3. All shoreline areas, water features, floodplains, and other critical areas, and related buffers within three hundred feet (300') of the project area.

C.    Minimum Standards For Wetland Reports: In addition to the minimum required contents in section 10-5-9, a critical area report for wetlands shall contain an analysis of the wetlands, including the following site- and proposal-related information at a minimum:

1. A written assessment and accompanying maps of the wetlands and buffers within three hundred feet (300') of the project area, including the following information at a minimum:

a. Wetland delineation and required buffers;

b. Existing wetland acreage based on a professional survey from the field delineation (acreages for on-site portion and entire wetland area including off-site portions);

c. Wetland rating and category based on entire wetland complex;

d. Cowardin classification of vegetation communities including vegetation characterization;

e. Habitat elements;

f. Soil and substrate conditions based on site assessment and/or soil survey information;

g. Topographic elevations, at two-foot (2') contours;

h. A discussion of the water sources supplying the wetland and documentation of hydrologic regime (locations of inlet and outlet features, water depths throughout the wetland, evidence of recharge or discharge, evidence of water depths throughout the year – algal mats, flood debris, and sediment deposits); and

i. Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) classification.

2. A discussion of measures, including avoidance, minimization, and mitigation, proposed to preserve existing wetlands and restore any wetlands that were degraded prior to the current proposed land use activity.

3. A habitat and native vegetation conservation strategy that addresses methods to protect and enhance on-site habitat and wetland functions.

4. Functional evaluation for the wetland and adjacent buffer using a local or state agency staff-recognized method and including the reference of the method and all data sheets.

5. A scale map of the development proposal site and adjacent area.

6. A discussion of ongoing management practices that will protect wetlands after the project site has been developed; including proposed monitoring and maintenance programs.

7. A bond estimate for the installation (including site preparation, plant materials and installation, fertilizers, mulch, stakes) and the proposed monitoring and maintenance work for the required number of years.

8. Title Notification: All activity in critical area protection areas shall be accompanied by a notice on title.

D.    Compensatory Mitigation Reports: When a project involves wetland and/or buffer impacts, a compensatory mitigation report shall be required (in addition to the wetland critical area report), meeting the following minimum standards:

1. Preparation By A Qualified Professional(s): A compensatory mitigation report for wetland or buffer impacts shall be prepared by one (1) or more qualified professional(s) including someone who is a certified professional wetland scientist or a noncertified professional wetland scientist; either of them must have a minimum of five (5) years’ experience designing compensatory mitigation designs that have been installed and monitored for a minimum of two (2) years to verify success. In addition, the design team may include civil engineers, landscape architects or landscape designers depending upon the complexity of the project.

2. Minimum Standards For Compensatory Mitigation Report: This report shall include a written report and plan sheets that contain, at a minimum, the following elements. Full guidance can be found in "Wetland Mitigation in Washington State, Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans" (Version 1, Ecology Publication No. 06-06-011b, March 2006).

a. The written report must contain, at a minimum:

i. The name and contact information of the applicant, the name, qualifications, and contact information for the primary author(s) of the report, a description of the proposal, a summary of the impacts and proposed compensation concept, and identification of all the local, state, and/or federal wetland related permit(s) required for the project, plus a vicinity map for the project;

ii. Description of the existing wetland and buffer areas proposed to be impacted including: acreages (or square footage) based on professional surveys of the delineations; Cowardin classifications including dominant vegetation community types (for upland and wetland habitats); the results of a functional assessment for the entire wetland and the portions proposed to be impacted; wetland rating based on the provisions of this chapter;

iii. An assessment of the potential changes in wetland hydroperiod from the proposed project and how the design has been modified to avoid, minimize or reduce adverse impacts to the wetland hydroperiod;

iv. A description of the proposed conceptual compensation actions for wetland and upland areas. A description of future vegetation community types for years one (1), three (3), five (5), ten (10) and twenty-five (25) post-installation, including the succession of vegetation community types and dominants expected. A description of the successional sequence of expected changes in hydroperiod for the compensation site(s) for the same time periods as vegetation success. A description of the change in habitat characteristics expected over the same twenty-five (25) year time period;

v. An assessment of existing conditions in the zone of the proposed compensation, including: vegetation community structure and composition, existing hydroperiod, existing soil conditions, and existing habitat functions. An estimate of future conditions in this location if the compensation actions are not undertaken (i.e., how would this site progress through natural succession);

vi. The field data collected to document existing conditions and on which future condition assumptions are based for hydroperiod (e.g., soil pit data – hand dug or mechanically trenched; soil boring data). Soil survey data is not sufficient to rely upon for establishing existing conditions;

vii. A discussion of ongoing management practices that will protect wetlands after the project site has been developed, including proposed monitoring and maintenance programs;

viii. A bond estimate for the entire compensatory mitigation including the following elements: site preparation, plant materials, construction materials, installation oversight, maintenance twice per year for up to five (5) years, annual monitoring field work and reporting, and contingency actions for a maximum of the total required number of years for monitoring; and

ix. Proof of establishment of a notice on title for the wetlands and buffers on the project site, including the compensatory mitigation areas.

b. The scaled plan sheets for the compensatory mitigation must contain, at a minimum:

i. Existing wetland and buffer surveyed edges, proposed areas of wetland and/or buffer impacts, location of proposed wetland and/or buffer compensation actions;

ii. Existing topography, ground-proofed, at two-foot (2') contour intervals in the zone of the proposed compensation actions if any grading activity is proposed to create the compensation area(s). Existing cross-sections of on-site wetland areas that are proposed to be impacted. Cross-section(s) (estimated one-foot (1') intervals) for the proposed areas of wetland or buffer compensation;

iii. Surface and subsurface hydrologic conditions including an analysis of existing and proposed hydrologic regimes for enhanced, created, or restored compensatory mitigation areas. Illustration of how data for existing hydrologic conditions were utilized to inform the estimates of future hydrologic regimes;

iv. Proposed conditions expected from the proposed actions on site including future HGM types, vegetation community types by dominant species (wetland and upland), and future hydrologic regimes;

v. Required wetland buffers for existing wetlands and proposed compensation areas. Zones where buffers are proposed to be reduced or enlarged outside of the standards identified in this chapter;

vi. A plant schedule including all species by proposed community type and hydrologic regime, size and type of plant material to be installed, spacing of plants, "typical" clustering patterns, total number of each species by community type, and timing of installation;

vii. Performance standards (measurable standards reflective of years post-installation) for upland and wetland communities, monitoring schedule, and maintenance schedule and actions by each bi-annum.

E.    Additional Information: When appropriate, the city planner may also require the critical area report to include an evaluation by the State Department of Ecology or an independent qualified expert regarding the applicant’s analysis and the effectiveness of any proposed mitigating measures or programs, and to include any recommendations as appropriate.

1. If the development proposal site contains or is within a wetland area, the applicant shall submit an affidavit, which declares whether the applicant has knowledge of any illegal alteration to any or all wetlands on the proposed site and whether the applicant previously had been found in violation of this title. If the applicant has been found previously in violation, the applicant shall declare whether such violation has been corrected to the satisfaction of the jurisdiction.

2. The city planner shall determine if the mitigation and monitoring plans and bonding measures proposed by the applicant are sufficient to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, consistent with the goals, purposes, objectives and requirements of chapter 5 of this title and this chapter. (Ord. 695, 11-22-2004; Ord. 938, 5-23-2016. Formerly 10-5A-3)

10-5A-5 BUFFERS:

A.    Buffer Requirements: The standard buffer widths in Table 1 have been established in accordance with the best available science. They are based on the category of wetland and the habitat score as determined by a qualified wetland professional using the Washington State wetland rating system for western Washington.

1. The use of the standard buffer widths requires the implementation of the measures in Table 2, where applicable, to minimize the impacts of the adjacent land uses.

2. If an applicant chooses not to apply the mitigation measures in Table 2, then a thirty-three percent (33%) increase in the width of all buffers is required. For example, a seventy-five-foot (75') buffer with the mitigation measures would be a one-hundred-foot (100') buffer without them.

3. The standard buffer widths assume that the buffer is vegetated with a native plant community appropriate for the ecoregion. If the existing buffer is unvegetated, sparsely vegetated, or vegetated with invasive species that do not perform needed functions, the buffer should either be planted to create the appropriate plant community or the buffer should be widened to ensure that adequate functions of the buffer are provided.

4. Standard buffer widths are widened for wetlands with higher habitat scores. For example, a Category I wetland with a habitat score of eight (8) to nine (9) points would require a buffer of two hundred twenty-five feet (225').

Table 1: Wetland Buffer Requirements

Wetland Category	Standard Buffer Width Required for Habitat Score 3 – 4	Buffer Width Required for Habitat Score 5	Buffer Width Required for Habitat Score 6 – 7	Buffer Width Required for Habitat Score 8 – 9
Category I: Based on total score	75 ft	105 ft	165 ft	225 ft
Category I: Bogs; Natural Heritage Wetlands	190 ft	NA	NA	225 ft
Category I: Forested	75 ft	105 ft	165 ft	225 ft
Category II: Based on score	75 ft	105 ft	165 ft	225 ft
Category III (all)	60 ft	105 ft	165 ft	NA
Category IV (all)	40 ft	NA	NA	NA

Table 2: Required Measures to Minimize Impacts to Wetlands

Disturbance	Required Measures to Minimize Impacts
Lights	•    Direct lights away from wetland
Noise	•    Locate activity that generates noise away from wetland •    If warranted, enhance existing buffer with native vegetation plantings adjacent to noise source •    For activities that generate relatively continuous, potentially disruptive noise, such as certain heavy industry or mining, establish an additional 10-foot heavily vegetated buffer strip immediately adjacent to the outer wetland buffer
Toxic runoff	•    Route all new, untreated runoff away from wetland while ensuring wetland is not dewatered •    Establish covenants limiting use of pesticides within 150 feet of wetland •    Apply integrated pest management
Stormwater runoff	•    Retrofit stormwater detention and treatment for roads and existing adjacent development •    Prevent channelized flow from lawns that directly enters the buffer •    Use Low Intensity Development techniques (per Low Impact Development Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound)
Change in water regime	•    Infiltrate or treat, detain, and disperse into buffer new runoff from impervious surfaces and new lawns
Pets and human disturbance	•    Use privacy fencing or plant dense vegetation to delineate buffer edge and to discourage disturbance using vegetation appropriate for the ecoregion •    Place wetland and its buffer in a separate tract or protect with a conservation easement
Dust	•    Use best management practices to control dust
Disruption of corridors or connections	•    Maintain connections to off-site areas that are undisturbed •    Restore corridors or connections to off-site habitats by replanting

5. Increased Wetland Buffer Area Width: Buffer widths shall be increased on a case-by-case basis as determined by the city planner when a larger buffer is necessary to protect wetland functions and values. This determination shall be supported by appropriate documentation showing that it is reasonably related to protection of the functions and values of the wetland. The documentation must include but not be limited to the following criteria:

a. The wetland is used by a plant or animal species listed by the federal government or the state as endangered, threatened, candidate, sensitive, monitored or documented priority species or habitats, or essential or outstanding habitat for those species or has unusual nesting or resting sites such as heron rookeries or raptor nesting trees; or

b. The adjacent land is susceptible to severe erosion, and erosion-control measures will not effectively prevent adverse wetland impacts; or

c. The adjacent land has minimal vegetative cover or slopes greater than thirty percent (30%).

6. Buffer averaging to improve wetland protection may be permitted when all of the following conditions are met:

a. The wetland has significant differences in characteristics that affect its habitat functions, such as a wetland with a forested component adjacent to a degraded emergent component or a "dual-rated" wetland with a Category I area adjacent to a lower-rated area.

b. The buffer is increased adjacent to the higher-functioning area of habitat or more-sensitive portion of the wetland and decreased adjacent to the lower-functioning or less-sensitive portion as demonstrated by a critical areas report from a qualified wetland professional.

c. The total area of the buffer after averaging is equal to the area required without averaging.

d. The buffer at its narrowest point is never less than either seventy-five percent (75%) of the required width or seventy-five feet (75') for Category I and II, fifty feet (50') for Category III, and twenty-five feet (25') for Category IV, whichever is greater.

7. Averaging to allow reasonable use of a parcel may be permitted when all of the following are met:

a. There are no feasible alternatives to the site design that could be accomplished without buffer averaging.

b. The averaged buffer will not result in degradation of the wetland’s functions and values as demonstrated by a critical areas report from a qualified wetland professional.

c. The total buffer area after averaging is equal to the area required without averaging.

d. The buffer at its narrowest point is never less than either three-quarters (3/4) of the required width or seventy-five feet (75') for Category I and II, fifty feet (50') for Category III and twenty-five feet (25') for Category IV, whichever is greater.

B.    To facilitate long-range planning using a landscape approach, the city planner may identify and preassess wetlands using the rating system and establish appropriate wetland buffer widths for such wetlands. The city planner will prepare maps of wetlands that have been preassessed in this manner.

C.    Measurement Of Wetland Buffers: All buffers shall be measured perpendicular from the wetland boundary as surveyed in the field. The buffer for a wetland created, restored, or enhanced as compensation for approved wetland alterations shall be the same as the buffer required for the category of the created, restored, or enhanced wetland. Only fully vegetated buffers will be considered. Lawns, walkways, driveways, and other mowed or paved areas will not be considered buffers or included in buffer area calculations.

D.    Buffers On Mitigation Sites: All mitigation sites shall have buffers consistent with the buffer requirements of this chapter. Buffers shall be based on the expected or target category of the proposed wetland mitigation site.

E.    Buffer Maintenance: Except as otherwise specified or allowed in accordance with this chapter, wetland buffers shall be retained in an undisturbed or enhanced condition. In the case of compensatory mitigation sites, removal of invasive nonnative weeds is required for the duration of the mitigation bond or other financial guarantee approved by the city.

F.    Allowed Buffer Uses: The following uses may be allowed within a wetland buffer in accordance with the review procedures of this chapter, provided they are not prohibited by any other applicable law and they are conducted in a manner so as to minimize impacts to the buffer and adjacent wetland:

1. Conservation and restoration activities. Conservation or restoration activities aimed at protecting the soil, water, vegetation, or wildlife.

2. Passive recreation. Passive recreation facilities designed and in accordance with an approved critical area report, including:

a. Walkways and trails; provided, that those pathways are limited to minor crossings having no adverse impact on water quality. They should be generally parallel to the perimeter of the wetland, located only in the outer twenty-five percent (25%) of the wetland buffer area, and located to avoid removal of significant trees. They should be limited to pervious surfaces no more than five feet (5') in width for pedestrian use only. Raised boardwalks utilizing nontreated pilings may be acceptable.

b. Wildlife-viewing structures.

3. Educational and scientific research activities.

4. Normal and routine maintenance and repair of any existing public or private facilities within an existing right-of-way; provided, that the maintenance or repair does not increase the footprint or use of the facility or right-of-way.

5. The harvesting of wild crops in a manner that is not injurious to natural reproduction of such crops and provided the harvesting does not require tilling of soil, planting of crops, chemical applications, or alteration of the wetland by changing existing topography, water conditions, or water sources.

6. Drilling for utilities/utility corridors under a buffer, with entrance/exit portals located completely outside of the wetland buffer boundary; provided, that the drilling does not interrupt the ground water connection to the wetland or percolation of surface water down through the soil column. Specific studies by a hydrologist are necessary to determine whether the ground water connection to the wetland or percolation of surface water down through the soil column is disturbed.

7. Enhancement of a wetland buffer through the removal of nonnative invasive plant species. Removal of invasive plant species shall be restricted to hand removal. All removed plant material shall be taken away from the site and appropriately disposed of. Plants that appear on the Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board list of noxious weeds must be handled and disposed of according to a noxious weed control plan appropriate to that species. Revegetation with appropriate native species at natural densities is allowed in conjunction with removal of invasive plant species.

8. Stormwater management facilities. Stormwater management facilities are limited to stormwater dispersion outfalls and bioswales. They may be allowed within the outer twenty-five percent (25%) of the buffer of Category III or IV wetlands only; provided, that:

a. No other location is feasible; and

b. The location of such facilities will not degrade the functions or values of the wetland; and

c. Stormwater management facilities are not allowed in buffers of Category I or II wetlands.

9. Nonconforming uses. Repair and maintenance of nonconforming uses or structures, where legally established within the buffer, provided they do not increase the degree of nonconformity.

G.    Signs And Fencing Of Wetlands And Buffers:

1. Temporary Markers: The outer perimeter of the wetland buffer and the clearing limits identified by an approved permit or authorization shall be marked in the field with temporary "clearing limits" fencing in such a way as to ensure that no unauthorized intrusion will occur. The marking is subject to inspection by the city planner prior to the commencement of permitted activities. This temporary marking shall be maintained throughout construction and shall not be removed until permanent signs, if required, are in place.

2. Permanent Signs: As a condition of any permit or authorization issued pursuant to this chapter, the city planner may require the applicant to install permanent signs along the boundary of a wetland or buffer.

a. Permanent signs shall be made of an enamel-coated metal face and attached to a metal post or another nontreated material of equal durability. Signs must be posted at an interval of one (1) per lot or every fifty feet (50'), whichever is less, and must be maintained by the property owner in perpetuity. The signs shall be worded as follows or with alternative language approved by the city planner:

Protected Wetland Area

Do Not Disturb

Contact City of Roy Regarding Uses, Restrictions, and Opportunities for Stewardship

b. The provisions of subsection G2a of this section may be modified as necessary to assure protection of sensitive features or wildlife.

3. Fencing:

a. The applicant shall be required to install a permanent fence around the wetland or buffer when domestic grazing animals are present or may be introduced on site.

b. Fencing installed as part of a proposed activity or as required in this subsection shall be designed so as to not interfere with species migration, including fish runs, and shall be constructed in a manner that minimizes impacts to the wetland and associated habitat. (Ord. 695, 11-22-2004; Ord. 938, 5-23-2016. Formerly 10-5A-4)

10-5A-6 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS:

A.    Mitigation Sequencing: Before impacting any wetland or its buffer, an applicant shall demonstrate that the following actions have been taken. Actions are listed in the order of preference:

1. Avoid the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action.

2. Minimize impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, by using appropriate technology, or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts.

3. Rectify the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment.

4. Reduce or eliminate the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations.

5. Compensate for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments.

6. Monitor the impact and take appropriate corrective measures.

B.    Compensatory mitigation for alterations to wetlands shall be used only for impacts that cannot be avoided or minimized and shall achieve equivalent or greater biologic functions. Compensatory mitigation plans shall be consistent with "Wetland Mitigation in Washington State, Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans – Version 1" (Ecology Publication No. 06-06-011b, Olympia, WA, March 2006 or as revised), and "Selected Wetland Mitigation Sites using a Watershed Approach (Western Washington)," (Publication No. 09-06-32, Olympia, WA, December 2009).

C.    Compensation For Lost Or Affected Functions: Compensation shall address the functions affected by the proposed project, with an intention to achieve functional equivalency or improvement of functions. The goal shall be for the compensatory mitigation to provide similar wetland functions as those lost, except when either:

1. The lost wetland provides minimal functions as determined by a site-specific function assessment, and the proposed compensatory mitigation action(s) will provide equal or greater functions or will provide functions shown to be limiting within a watershed through a formal Washington State watershed assessment plan or protocol; or

2. Out-of-kind replacement of wetland type or functions will best meet watershed goals formally identified by the city, such as replacement of historically diminished wetland types.

D.    Preference Of Mitigation Actions: Methods to achieve compensation for wetland functions shall be approached in the following order of preference:

1. Restoration (re-establishment and rehabilitation) of wetlands.

2. Creation (establishment) of wetlands on disturbed upland sites such as those with vegetative cover consisting primarily of nonnative introduced species. This should only be attempted when there is an adequate source of water and it can be shown that the surface and subsurface hydrologic regime is conducive for the wetland community that is anticipated in the design.

3. Enhancement of significantly degraded wetlands in combination with restoration or creation. Such enhancement should be part of a mitigation package that includes replacing the altered area and meeting appropriate ratio requirements.

4. Preservation. Preservation of high quality, at-risk wetlands as is generally acceptable when done in combination with restoration, creation or enhancement; provided, that a minimum 1:1 acreage replacement is provided by re-establishment or creation.

E.    Location Of Compensatory Mitigation: Compensatory mitigation actions shall be conducted within the same subdrainage basin and on the same site as the alteration except when all of the following apply:

1. There are no reasonable on-site or in-subdrainage basin opportunities (e.g., on-site options would require elimination of high functioning upland habitat), or opportunities on-site or within in-subdrainage basin do not have a high likelihood of success based on a determination of the capacity of the site to compensate for the impacts. Consideration should include: anticipated wetland mitigation replacement ratios, buffer conditions and proposed widths, available water to maintain anticipated hydrogeomorphic classes of wetlands when restored, proposed flood storage capacity, potential to mitigate riparian fish and wildlife impacts (such as connectivity);

2. On-site mitigation would require elimination of high-quality upland habitat;

3. Off-site mitigation has a greater likelihood of providing equal or improved wetland functions than the altered wetland; and

4. Off-site locations shall be in the same subdrainage basin unless:

a. Established watershed goals for water quality, flood storage or conveyance, habitat, or other wetland functions have been established by the city and strongly justify location of mitigation at another site;

b. Credits from a state certified wetland mitigation bank are used as mitigation and the use of credits is consistent with the terms of the certified bank’s instrument; and

c. Fees are paid to an approved in-lieu fee program to compensate for the impacts.

F.    Timing Of Compensatory Mitigation: It is preferred that compensation projects be completed prior to activities that will disturb wetlands. At the least, compensatory mitigation shall be completed immediately following disturbance and prior to use or occupancy of the action or development. Construction of mitigation projects shall be timed to reduce impacts to existing fisheries, wildlife, and flora.

The city planner may authorize a one (1) time temporary delay in completing construction or installation of the compensatory mitigation when the applicant provides a written explanation from a qualified wetland professional as to the rationale for the delay. An appropriate rationale would include identification of the environmental conditions that could produce a high probability of failure or significant construction difficulties (for example, project delay lapses past a fisheries window; or plan installation should be delayed until the dormant season to ensure greater survivability of installed materials). The delay shall not create or perpetuate hazardous conditions or environmental damage or degradation, and the delay shall not be injurious to the health, safety, and general welfare of the public. The request for the temporary delay must include a written justification that documents the environmental constraints that preclude implementation of the mitigation plan. The justification must be verified and approved by the city.

G.    Wetland Mitigation Ratios: The following ratios shall apply to creation or re-establishment, rehabilitation, or enhancement, that is in-kind, the same category, timed prior to or concurrent with alteration, and has a high probability of success. These ratios do not apply to remedial actions resulting from unauthorized alterations; greater ratios shall apply in those cases. These ratios do not apply to the use of credits from a state-certified wetland mitigation bank. When credits from a certified bank are used, replacement ratios should be consistent with the requirements of the bank’s certification. The first number specifies the acreage of replacement wetlands and the second specifies the acreage of wetlands altered.

Category and Type of Wetland	Creation or Re-establishment	Rehabilitation**	Enhancement
All Category IV	1.5:1	3:1	6:1
All Category III	2:1	4:1	8:1
All Category II	3:1	6:1	12:1
Category I: Mature Forested	6:1	12:1	24:1
Category I: Based on score for functions	4:1	8:1	16:1
Category I: Bog, Natural Heritage site	Not considered possible*	Case-by-case	Case-by-case

*    Natural Heritage sites and bogs are considered irreplaceable wetlands, and therefore no amount of compensation would replace these ecosystems. Avoidance is the best option. In the rare cases when impacts cannot be avoided, replacement ratios will be assigned on a case-by-case basis. However, these ratios will be significantly higher than the other ratios for Category I wetlands.

**    Rehabilitation ratios are based on the assumption that actions judged to be most effective for that site are being implemented.

H.    Wetland Mitigation Banks:

1. Credits from a wetland mitigation bank may be approved for use as compensation for unavoidable impacts to wetlands when:

a. The bank is certified under state rules;

b. The city planner determines that the wetland mitigation bank provides appropriate compensation for the authorized impacts; and

c. The proposed use of credits is consistent with replacement ratios specified in the certified bank instrument.

2. Credits from a certified wetland mitigation bank may be used to compensate for impacts located within the service area specified in the certified bank instrument. In some cases, the service area of the bank may include portions of more than one adjacent drainage basin for specific wetland functions.

I.    Credit/Debit Method: To more fully protect functions and values, and as an alternative to the mitigation ratios found in the joint guidance "Wetland Mitigation in Washington State Parts I and II" (Ecology Publication No. 06-06-011a-b, Olympia, WA, March, 2006), the city planner may allow mitigation based on the "credit/debit" method developed by the Department of Ecology in "Calculating Credits and Debits for Compensatory Mitigation in Wetlands of Western Washington: Final Report," (Ecology Publication No. 10-06-011, Olympia, WA, March 2012, or as revised).

J.    In-Lieu Fee: To aid in the implementation of off-site mitigation, the city may develop an in-lieu fee program. This program shall be developed and approved through a public process and be consistent with federal rules, state policy on in-lieu fee mitigation, and state water quality regulations. An approved in-lieu fee program sells compensatory mitigation credits to permittees whose obligation to provide compensatory mitigation is then transferred to the in-lieu program sponsor, a governmental or nonprofit natural resource management entity. Credits from an approved in-lieu fee program may be used when subsections J1 through 6 of this section apply:

1. The approval authority determines that it would provide environmentally appropriate compensation for the proposed impacts.

2. The mitigation will occur on a site identified using the site selection and prioritization process in the approved in-lieu fee program instrument.

3. The proposed use of credits is consistent with the terms and conditions of the approved in-lieu fee program instrument.

4. Land acquisition and initial physical and biological improvements of the mitigation site must be completed within three (3) years of the credit sale.

5. Projects using in-lieu fee credits shall have debits associated with the proposed impacts calculated by the applicant’s qualified wetland scientist using the method consistent with the credit assessment method specified in the approved instrument for the in-lieu fee program.

6. Credits from an approved in-lieu fee program may be used to compensate for impacts located within the service area specified in the approved in-lieu fee instrument.

K.    Buffer Mitigation Ratios: Impacts to buffers shall be mitigated at a 1:1 ratio. Compensatory buffer mitigation shall replace those buffer functions lost from development.

L.    Protection Of The Mitigation Site: The area where the mitigation occurred and any associated buffer shall be located in a critical area tract or a conservation easement.

M.    Monitoring: Mitigation monitoring shall be required for a period necessary to establish that performance standards have been met, but not for a period less than five (5) years. If a scrub-shrub or forested vegetation community is proposed, monitoring may be required for ten (10) years or more. The project mitigation plan shall include monitoring elements that ensure certainty of success for the project’s natural resource values and functions. If the mitigation goals are not obtained within the initial five (5) year period, the applicant remains responsible for restoration of the natural resource values and functions until the mitigation goals agreed to in the mitigation plan are achieved.

N.    Advance Mitigation: Mitigation for projects with preidentified impacts to wetlands may be constructed in advance of the impacts if the mitigation is implemented according to federal rules, state policy on advance mitigation, and state water quality regulations.

O.    Alternative Mitigation Plans: The city planner may approve alternative critical areas mitigation plans that are based on best available science, such as priority restoration plans that achieve restoration goals identified in the SMP. Alternative mitigation proposals must provide an equivalent or better level of protection of critical area functions and values than would be provided by the strict application of this chapter.

The city planner shall consider the following for approval of an alternative mitigation proposal:

1. The proposal uses a watershed approach consistent with "Selecting Wetland Mitigation Sites Using a Watershed Approach (Western Washington)" (Ecology Publication No. 09-06-32, Olympia, WA, December 2009).

2. Creation or enhancement of a larger system of natural areas and open space is preferable to the preservation of many individual habitat areas.

3. Mitigation according to subsection E of this section is not feasible due to site constraints such as parcel size, stream type, wetland category, or geologic hazards.

4. There is clear potential for success of the proposed mitigation at the proposed mitigation site.

5. The plan shall contain clear and measurable standards for achieving compliance with the specific provisions of the plan. A monitoring plan shall, at a minimum, meet the provisions in subsection M of this section.

6. The plan shall be reviewed and approved as part of overall approval of the proposed use.

7. A wetland of a different type is justified based on regional needs or functions and values; the replacement ratios may not be reduced or eliminated unless the reduction results in a preferred environmental alternative.

8. Mitigation guarantees shall meet the minimum requirements as outlined in subsection 10-5A-4D2aviii.

9. Qualified professionals in each of the critical areas addressed shall prepare the plan.

10. The city may consult with agencies with expertise and jurisdiction over the resources during the review to assist with analysis and identification of appropriate performance measures that adequately safeguard critical areas.

(Ord. 695, 11-22-2004; Ord. 938, 5-23-2016. Formerly 10-5A-5)